Literature DB >> 21404052

Relationship between Wiberg's lateral center edge angle, Lequesne's acetabular index, and medial acetabular bone stock.

Clément M L Werner1, Carol E Copeland, Thomas Ruckstuhl, Jeff Stromberg, Clifford H Turen, Samy Bouaicha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of acetabular anatomy is crucial for cup positioning in total hip replacement. Medial wall thickness of the acetabulum is known to correlate with the degree of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). No data exist about the relationship of routinely used radiographic parameters such as Wiberg's lateral center edge angle (LCE-angle) or Lequesne's acetabular index (AI) with thickness of the medial acetabular wall in the general population. The aim of our study was to clarify the relationship between LCE, AI, and thickness of the medial acetabular wall.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements on plain radiographs (LCE and AI) and axial CT scans (quadrilateral plate acetabular distance QPAD) of 1,201 individuals (2,402 hips) were obtained using a PACS imaging program and statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The mean thickness of the medial acetabulum bone stock (QPAD) was 1.08 mm (95% CI: 1.05-1.10) with a range of 0.1 to 8.8 mm. For pathological values of either the LCE (<20°) or the AI (>12°) the medial acetabular wall showed to be thicker than in radiological normal hips. The overall correlation between coxometric indices and medial acetabular was weak for LCE (r =-0.21. 95% CI [-0.25, -0.17]) and moderate for AI (r = 0.37, [0.33, 0.41]).
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a linear relationship between Wiberg's lateral center edge angle, Lequesne's acetabular index and medial acetabular bone stock in radiological normal hips but medial acetabular wall thickness increases with dysplastic indices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21404052     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1141-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  16 in total

1.  Correlation between the acetabular diameter and thickness in Thais.

Authors:  Namchai Varodompun; Tshewang Thinley; Boonyarak Visutipol; Bunyat Ketmalasiri; Narongchai Pattarabunjerd
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.118

2.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Samatchai Chamnongkich; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  M Tannast; G Zheng; C Anderegg; K Burckhardt; F Langlotz; R Ganz; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Percutaneous fixation of the pelvic ring: an update.

Authors:  P V Giannoudis; C C Tzioupis; H-C Pape; C S Roberts
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02

Review 5.  Anterior iliopsoas impingement and tendinitis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Justin R Kauk
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  J F Crowe; V J Mani; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The medial acetabular wall: normal measurements in different population groups.

Authors:  M G Stein; E Barmeir; J Levin; B Dubowitz; M Roffman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Iliopsoas impingement after total hip replacement: the results of non-operative management, tenotomy or acetabular revision.

Authors:  C Dora; M Houweling; P Koch; R J Sierra
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

9.  Intrapelvic migration of total hip prostheses. Operative treatment.

Authors:  N S Eftekhar; O Nercessian
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  M Jasty; M J Anderson; W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Reconstruction of the Acetabulum in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; Michael Christodoulou; Gregory Sasalos; George C Babis
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

2.  Superiority of the modified Tönnis angle over the Tönnis angle in the radiographic diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Liangguo Fa; Qing Wang; Xiangxing Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles.

Authors:  Joey A Hanson; Ashley L Kapron; Kathryn M Swenson; Travis G Maak; Christopher L Peters; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-13

4.  Dynamic long leg casting fixation for treating 12- to 18-month-old infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Zhencun Cai; Lianyong Li; Lijun Zhang; Shijun Ji; Qun Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Correlation of radiographic variables to guide safe implant positioning during acetabular surgery and hip replacement: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Simon Tiziani; Georg Osterhoff; Jan-Farei Campagna; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2019-03-12

6.  The lateral center-edge angle as radiographic selection criteria for periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients aged above 13 years.

Authors:  Daguang Zhang; Xin Pan; Hong Zhang; Dianzhong Luo; Hui Cheng; Kai Xiao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Does increased acetabular depth affect safe infra-acetabular screw placement in acetabular fracture fixation?

Authors:  Johannes Dominik Bastian; David Riccardo Näf; Jennifer Larissa Cullmann; Marius Johann Keel; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.693

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.