Literature DB >> 10416900

A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study.

B Friberg1, L Sennerby, N Meredith, U Lekholm.   

Abstract

Oral implant treatment ad modum Brånemark was undertaken in nine patients with edentulous maxillae. Cutting torque measurements and resonance frequency analyses (RFA) were conducted at implant placement and the corresponding values were subjected to correlation analyses. The implants were also evaluated with RFA at abutment connection and at one-year follow-up in order to identify possible changes in implant stability. A total of 61 implants were inserted, of which 49 were of the Mk II self-tapping type. Two implants were lost during the study period. The cumulative torque was presented as a mean value for the upper/crestal, the middle and the lower/apical third of the implant site respectively, as well as an overall value for the whole site. The highest correlation (r = 0.84, P<0.05) was found when comparing the mean torque values of the upper/crestal portion with the resonance frequency values at implant placement. The Mk II implant sites were divided into three groups based on the values of the cutting torque, i.e. soft (group 1), medium (group 2) and dense bone (group 3). The mean value of each group was plotted against the corresponding mean value of resonance frequency measured at implant insertion. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in resonance frequency at implant insertion between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.047) and between groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.002). When repeating the resonance frequency analyses at second stage surgery and at one-year follow-up, no significant differences were detected between any of the groups. It was shown that the stability of implants placed in softer bone seemed to "catch up" over time with more dense bone sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10416900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  42 in total

1.  [Primary implant stability with different bone surgery techniques. An in vitro study of the mandible of the minipig].

Authors:  A Büchter; J Kleinheinz; U Joos; U Meyer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-10-24

2.  [Peri-implant bone formation around cylindrical and conical implant systems].

Authors:  A Büchter; J Kleinheinz; H-P Wiesmann; L Seper; U Joos; U Meyer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-07-23

3.  Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis.

Authors:  Annette Rabel; Steffen Gerhard Köhler; Andrea Maria Schmidt-Westhausen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Assessment of Osstell™ and Periotest® systems in measuring dental implant stability (in vitro study).

Authors:  Samer Al-Jetaily; Abdullah Alfarraj Al-Dosari
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-13

5.  Predictive values of resonance frequency analysis as a diagnostic tool in palatal implant loss.

Authors:  Katja Wieczorek; Winfried Harzer; Heinrich Wehrbein; Maximilian Moergel; Martin Kunkel; Britta A Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Immediate loading: a new implant technique with immediate loading and aesthetics: Nobel Active™.

Authors:  D Moretto; M Gargari; E Nordsjö; F Gloria; L Ottria
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-02-01

7.  Correlation between primary stability and bone healing of surface treated titanium implants in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.

Authors:  Julie Rozé; Alain Hoornaert; Pierre Layrolle
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on dental implant osseointegration: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yakup Ustun; Ozgur Erdogan; Mehmet Kurkcu; Tolga Akova; Ibrahim Damlar
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-10

9.  A comparison of the implant stability among various implant systems: clinical study.

Authors:  Jae-Min Kim; Sun-Jong Kim; Inho Han; Sang-Wan Shin; Jae-Jun Ryu
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Glycemic control and implant stabilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  T W Oates; S Dowell; M Robinson; C A McMahan
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.