Literature DB >> 10368386

Responses of cochlear nucleus units in the chinchilla to iterated rippled noises: analysis of neural autocorrelograms.

W P Shofner1.   

Abstract

Temporal encoding of stimulus features related to the pitch of iterated rippled noises was studied for single units in the chinchilla cochlear nucleus. Unlike other periodic complex sounds that produce pitch, iterated rippled noises have neither periodic waveforms nor highly modulated envelopes. Infinitely iterated rippled noise (IIRN) is generated when wideband noise (WBN) is delayed (tau), attenuated, and then added to (+) or subtracted from (-) the undelayed WBN through positive feedback. The pitch of IIRN[+, tau, -1 dB] is at 1/tau, whereas the pitch of IIRN[-, tau, -1 dB] is at 1/2tau. Temporal responses of cochlear nucleus units were measured using neural autocorrelograms. Synchronous responses as shown by peaks in neural autocorrelograms that occur at time lags corresponding to the IIRN tau can be observed for both primarylike and chopper unit types. Comparison of the neural autocorrelograms in response to IIRN[+, tau, -1 dB] and IIRN[-, tau, -1 dB] indicates that the temporal discharge of primarylike units reflects the stimulus waveform fine structure, whereas the temporal discharge patterns of chopper units reflect the stimulus envelope. The pitch of IIRN[+/-, tau, -1 dB] can be accounted for by the temporal discharge patterns of primarylike units but not by the temporal discharge of chopper units. To quantify the temporal responses, the height of the peak in the neural autocorrelogram at a given time lag was measured as normalized rate. Although it is well documented that chopper units give larger synchronous responses than primarylike units to the fundamental frequency of periodic complex stimuli, the largest normalized rates in response to IIRN[+, tau, -1 dB] were obtained for primarylike units, not chopper units. The results suggest that if temporal encoding is important in pitch processing, then primarylike units are likely to be an important cochlear nucleus subsystem that carries the pitch-related information to higher auditory centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368386     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.2662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Sensitivity of cochlear nucleus neurons to spatio-temporal changes in auditory nerve activity.

Authors:  Grace I Wang; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A map of functional synaptic connectivity in the mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Luke Campagnola; Paul B Manis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  I M Winter; L Wiegrebe; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Representation of the spectral dominance region of pitch in the steady-state temporal discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus units.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.