Literature DB >> 22648236

How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer?

Gerald Gartlehner1, Kylie Thaler, Seth Hill, Richard A Hansen.   

Abstract

Clinicians can choose among various second-generation antidepressants for treating depressive disorders, such as major depressive disorder, subsyndromal depression, or dysthymia. Systematic reviews indicate that available drugs differ in frequency of administration, costs, and the risks of some adverse events but have similar efficacy for treating major depressive disorder. Furthermore, evidence does not support the choice of one antidepressant over another based on accompanying symptoms, such anxiety, insomnia, or pain. Available studies provide little guidance for clinicians about the benefits of second-generation antidepressants for treating dysthymia and subsyndromal depression. Evidence is also unclear about the comparative risks of serious adverse events, such as suicidality, seizures, fractures, increased bleeding, or serotonin syndrome. This article summarizes the best available evidence regarding comparative benefits and harms of second-generation antidepressants for treating depressive disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22648236     DOI: 10.1007/s11920-012-0283-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep        ISSN: 1523-3812            Impact factor:   5.285


  96 in total

1.  Sexual dysfunction associated with the treatment of depression: a placebo-controlled comparison of bupropion sustained release and sertraline treatment.

Authors:  C C Coleman; L A Cunningham; V J Foster; S R Batey; R M Donahue; T L Houser; J A Ascher
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.567

2.  Response in relation to baseline anxiety levels in major depressive disorder treated with bupropion sustained release or sertraline.

Authors:  A J Rush; M H Trivedi; T J Carmody; R M Donahue; T L Houser; C Bolden-Watson; S R Batey; J A Ascher; A Metz
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.

Authors:  D G S Perahia; F Wang; C H Mallinckrodt; D J Walker; M J Detke
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.361

4.  Once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) compared with fluoxetine in outpatients with depression and anxiety. Venlafaxine XR 360 Study Group.

Authors:  P H Silverstone; A Ravindran
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Mirtazapine compared with paroxetine in major depression.

Authors:  O Benkert; A Szegedi; R Kohnen
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Using meta-regression in performing indirect-comparisons: comparing escitalopram with venlafaxine XR.

Authors:  Laurent Eckert; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Risks of suicide and poisoning among elderly patients prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elham Rahme; Kaberi Dasgupta; Gustavo Turecki; Hacene Nedjar; Guillaume Galbaud du Fort
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Mirtazapine and paroxetine in major depression: a comparison of monotherapy versus their combination from treatment initiation.

Authors:  Pierre Blier; Gabriella Gobbi; Julie E Turcotte; Claude de Montigny; Nathalie Boucher; Chantal Hébert; Guy Debonnel
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 4.600

9.  Double-blind, randomized comparison of mirtazapine and paroxetine in elderly depressed patients.

Authors:  Alan F Schatzberg; Charlotte Kremer; Heidi E Rodrigues; Greer M Murphy
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Mirtazapine: efficacy and tolerability in comparison with fluoxetine in patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Mirtazapine-Fluoxetine Study Group.

Authors:  D P Wheatley; M van Moffaert; L Timmerman; C M Kremer
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ketamine and MAG Lipase Inhibitor-Dependent Reversal of Evolving Depressive-Like Behavior During Forced Abstinence From Alcohol Drinking.

Authors:  Katherine M Holleran; Hadley H Wilson; Tracy L Fetterly; Rebecca J Bluett; Samuel W Centanni; Rachel A Gilfarb; Lauren E R Rocco; Sachin Patel; Danny G Winder
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  HCN Channel Targets for Novel Antidepressant Treatment.

Authors:  Stacy M Ku; Ming-Hu Han
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  A systematic approach to pharmacotherapy for geriatric major depression.

Authors:  Benoit H Mulsant; Daniel M Blumberger; Zahinoor Ismail; Kiran Rabheru; Mark J Rapoport
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 4.  Vortioxetine for depression in adults.

Authors:  Markus Koesters; Giovanni Ostuzzi; Giuseppe Guaiana; Johanna Breilmann; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-05

5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures of Brain Structure to Predict Antidepressant Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Mayuresh S Korgaonkar; William Rekshan; Evian Gordon; A John Rush; Leanne M Williams; Christine Blasey; Stuart M Grieve
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 8.143

6.  Analysis of treatment patterns and persistence on branded and generic medications in major depressive disorder using retrospective claims data.

Authors:  Caitlyn T Solem; Ahmed Shelbaya; Yin Wan; Chinmay G Deshpande; Jose Alvir; Elizabeth Pappadopulos
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.