Literature DB >> 10359793

Activity regulation of Hox proteins, a mechanism for altering functional specificity in development and evolution.

X Li1, W McGinnis.   

Abstract

The closely related Hox transcription factors Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Antennapedia (Antp) respectively direct first abdominal (A1) and second thoracic (T2) segment identities in Drosophila. It has been proposed that their functional differences derive from their differential occupancy of DNA target sites. Here we show that a hybrid version of Ubx (Ubx-VP16), which possesses an enhanced transcriptional activation function, no longer directs A1 denticle pattern in embryonic epidermal cells. Instead, it mimics Antp in directing T2 denticle pattern, and it can rescue the cuticular loss-of-function phenotype of Antp mutants. In cells that do not produce denticles, Ubx-VP16 appears to have largely retained its normal repressive regulatory functions. These results suggest that the modulation of Hox activation and repression functions can account for segment-specific morphological differences that are controlled by different members of the Hox family. Our results also are consistent with the idea that activity regulation underlies the phenotypic suppression phenomenon in which a more posterior Hox protein suppresses the function of a more anterior member of the Hox cluster. The acquisition of novel activation and repression potentials in Hox proteins may be an important mechanism underlying the generation of subtle morphological differences during evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10359793      PMCID: PMC21996          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Functional dissection of Ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  R S Mann; D S Hogness
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Evidence of DNA: protein interactions that mediate HSV-1 immediate early gene activation by VP16.

Authors:  S J Triezenberg; K L LaMarco; S L McKnight
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  A model for extradenticle function as a switch that changes HOX proteins from repressors to activators.

Authors:  J Pinsonneault; B Florence; H Vaessin; W McGinnis
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Transcriptional activation and repression by Ultrabithorax proteins in cultured Drosophila cells.

Authors:  M A Krasnow; E E Saffman; K Kornfeld; D S Hogness
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-06-16       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Regulation of segmentation and segmental identity by Drosophila homeoproteins: the role of DNA binding in functional activity and specificity.

Authors:  M D Biggin; W McGinnis
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Uncoupling cadherin-based adhesion from wingless signalling in Drosophila.

Authors:  B Sanson; P White; J P Vincent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Activity regulation of a Hox protein and a role for the homeodomain in inhibiting transcriptional activation.

Authors:  X Li; C Murre; W McGinnis
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Signal-specific co-activator domain requirements for Pit-1 activation.

Authors:  L Xu; R M Lavinsky; J S Dasen; S E Flynn; E M McInerney; T M Mullen; T Heinzel; D Szeto; E Korzus; R Kurokawa; A K Aggarwal; D W Rose; C K Glass; M G Rosenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Are cross-regulatory interactions between homoeotic genes functionally significant?

Authors:  A González-Reyes; N Urquia; W J Gehring; G Struhl; G Morata
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Functional dominance among Hox genes: repression dominates activation in the regulation of Dpp.

Authors:  M Capovilla; J Botas
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  9 in total

1.  Target selectivity of bicoid is dependent on nonconsensus site recognition and protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  C Zhao; V Dave; F Yang; T Scarborough; J Ma
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein.

Authors:  J K Grenier; S B Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  In-phase oscillation of global regulons is orchestrated by a pole-specific organizer.

Authors:  Balaganesh Janakiraman; Johann Mignolet; Sharath Narayanan; Patrick H Viollier; Sunish Kumar Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins.

Authors:  Matthew Slattery; Todd Riley; Peng Liu; Namiko Abe; Pilar Gomez-Alcala; Iris Dror; Tianyin Zhou; Remo Rohs; Barry Honig; Harmen J Bussemaker; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Cell signaling switches HOX-PBX complexes from repressors to activators of transcription mediated by histone deacetylases and histone acetyltransferases.

Authors:  M Saleh; I Rambaldi; X J Yang; M S Featherstone
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Diversification and Functional Evolution of HOX Proteins.

Authors:  Narendra Pratap Singh; Robb Krumlauf
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-05-13

7.  Global control of motor neuron topography mediated by the repressive actions of a single hox gene.

Authors:  Heekyung Jung; Julie Lacombe; Esteban O Mazzoni; Karel F Liem; Jonathan Grinstein; Shaun Mahony; Debnath Mukhopadhyay; David K Gifford; Richard A Young; Kathryn V Anderson; Hynek Wichterle; Jeremy S Dasen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Hox proteins display a common and ancestral ability to diversify their interaction mode with the PBC class cofactors.

Authors:  Bruno Hudry; Sophie Remacle; Marie-Claire Delfini; René Rezsohazy; Yacine Graba; Samir Merabet
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Binding polymorphism in the DNA bound state of the Pdx1 homeodomain.

Authors:  Volodymyr Babin; Dongli Wang; Robert B Rose; Celeste Sagui
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.