Literature DB >> 9811579

Functional dominance among Hox genes: repression dominates activation in the regulation of Dpp.

M Capovilla1, J Botas.   

Abstract

Here we investigate the mechanisms by which Hox genes compete for the control of positional identity. Functional dominance is often observed where different Hox genes are co-expressed, and frequently the more posteriorly expressed Hox gene is the one that prevails, a phenomenon known as posterior prevalence. We use dpp674, a visceral mesoderm-specific enhancer of decapentaplegic (dpp), to investigate functional dominance among Hox genes molecularly. We find that posterior prevalence does not adequately describe the regulation of dpp by Hox genes. Instead, we find that abdominal-A (abd-A) dominates over the more posterior Abdominal-B (Abd-B) and the more anterior Ultrabithorax (Ubx). In the context of the dpp674 enhancer, abd-A functions as a repressor whereas Ubx and Abd-B function as activators. Thus, these results suggest that other cases of Hox competition and functional dominance may also be understood in terms of competition for target gene regulation in which repression dominates over activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811579     DOI: 10.1242/dev.125.24.4949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  16 in total

1.  Sustained expression of homeobox D10 inhibits angiogenesis.

Authors:  Connie Myers; Aubri Charboneau; Irene Cheung; Douglas Hanks; Nancy Boudreau
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Hox and senseless antagonism functions as a molecular switch to regulate EGF secretion in the Drosophila PNS.

Authors:  David Li-Kroeger; Lorraine M Witt; H Leighton Grimes; Tiffany A Cook; Brian Gebelein
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Hox proteins coordinate peripodial decapentaplegic expression to direct adult head morphogenesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Brian G Stultz; Sung Yeon Park; Mark A Mortin; James A Kennison; Deborah A Hursh
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Activity regulation of Hox proteins, a mechanism for altering functional specificity in development and evolution.

Authors:  X Li; W McGinnis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Compartmental modulation of abdominal Hox expression by engrailed and sloppy-paired patterns the fly ectoderm.

Authors:  Brian Gebelein; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  The Hox transcription factor Ubx stabilizes lineage commitment by suppressing cellular plasticity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Katrin Domsch; Julie Carnesecchi; Vanessa Disela; Jana Friedrich; Nils Trost; Olga Ermakova; Maria Polychronidou; Ingrid Lohmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The homeotic protein AGAMOUS controls late stamen development by regulating a jasmonate biosynthetic gene in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Toshiro Ito; Kian-Hong Ng; Tze-Soo Lim; Hao Yu; Elliot M Meyerowitz
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 8.  Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators.

Authors:  Richard S Mann; Katherine M Lelli; Rohit Joshi
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Roles of the Wnt effector POP-1/TCF in the C. elegans endomesoderm specification gene network.

Authors:  Melissa Owraghi; Gina Broitman-Maduro; Thomas Luu; Heather Roberson; Morris F Maduro
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Context-dependent regulation of Hox protein functions by CK2 phosphorylation sites.

Authors:  Ouarda Taghli-Lamallem; Cheryl Hsia; Matthew Ronshaugen; William McGinnis
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 0.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.