Literature DB >> 10639143

Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein.

J K Grenier1, S B Carroll.   

Abstract

The Hox genes have been implicated as central to the evolution of animal body plan diversity. Regulatory changes both in Hox expression domains and in Hox-regulated gene networks have arisen during the evolution of related taxa, but there is little knowledge of whether functional changes in Hox proteins have also contributed to morphological evolution. For example, the evolution of greater numbers of differentiated segments and body parts in insects, compared with the simpler body plans of arthropod ancestors, may have involved an increase in the spectrum of biochemical interactions of individual Hox proteins. Here, we compare the in vivo functions of orthologous Ultrabithorax (Ubx) proteins from the insect Drosophila melanogaster and from an onychophoran, a member of a sister phylum with a more primitive and homonomous body plan. These Ubx proteins, which have been diverging in sequence for over 540 million years, can generate many of the same gain-of-function tissue transformations and can activate and repress many of the same target genes when expressed during Drosophila development. However, the onychophora Ubx (OUbx) protein does not transform the segmental identity of the embryonic ectoderm or repress the Distal-less target gene. This functional divergence is due to sequence changes outside the conserved homeodomain region. The inability of OUbx to function like Drosophila Ubx (DUbx) in the embryonic ectoderm indicates that the Ubx protein may have acquired new cofactors or activity modifiers since the divergence of the onychophoran and insect lineages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10639143      PMCID: PMC15394          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  Developmental basis of limblessness and axial patterning in snakes.

Authors:  M J Cohn; C Tickle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A common mechanism for antenna-to-Leg transformation in Drosophila: suppression of homothorax transcription by four HOM-C genes.

Authors:  L C Yao; G J Liaw; C Y Pai; Y H Sun
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods.

Authors:  G Panganiban; A Sebring; L Nagy; S Carroll
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Extradenticle protein is a selective cofactor for the Drosophila homeotics: role of the homeodomain and YPWM amino acid motif in the interaction.

Authors:  F B Johnson; E Parker; M A Krasnow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The mouse Hox-1.3 gene is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila Sex combs reduced gene.

Authors:  J J Zhao; R A Lazzarini; L Pick
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Human Hox-4.2 and Drosophila deformed encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and larvae.

Authors:  N McGinnis; M A Kuziora; W McGinnis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Direct regulation of decapentaplegic by Ultrabithorax and its role in Drosophila midgut morphogenesis.

Authors:  M Capovilla; M Brandt; J Botas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes.

Authors:  A H Brand; N Perrimon
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology.

Authors:  A C Burke; C E Nelson; B A Morgan; C Tabin
Journal:  Development       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Targeted expression of the signaling molecule decapentaplegic induces pattern duplications and growth alterations in Drosophila wings.

Authors:  J Capdevila; I Guerrero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-10-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  20 in total

1.  Surprising flexibility in a conserved Hox transcription factor over 550 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Alison Heffer; Jeffrey W Shultz; Leslie Pick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential expression patterns of the hox gene are associated with differential growth of insect hind legs.

Authors:  Najmus S Mahfooz; Hua Li; Aleksandar Popadić
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The phylotypic stage as a boundary of modular memory: non mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  Jana Svorcová
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 1.919

4.  Adaptive evolution of HoxA-11 and HoxA-13 at the origin of the uterus in mammals.

Authors:  Vincent J Lynch; Jutta J Roth; Kazuhiko Takahashi; Casey W Dunn; Daisuke F Nonaka; Geffrey F Stopper; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Gene network polymorphism is the raw material of natural selection: the selfish gene network hypothesis.

Authors:  Zsolt Boldogköi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Wing-to-Leg homeosis by spineless causes apoptosis regulated by Fish-lips, a novel leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein.

Authors:  Takashi Adachi-Yamada; Toshiyuki Harumoto; Kayoko Sakurai; Ryu Ueda; Kaoru Saigo; Michael B O'Connor; Hiroshi Nakato
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Adaptive changes in the transcription factor HoxA-11 are essential for the evolution of pregnancy in mammals.

Authors:  Vincent J Lynch; Andrea Tanzer; Yajun Wang; Frederick C Leung; Birgit Gellersen; Deena Emera; Gunter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Molecular characterization and mapping of ATOH7, a human atonal homolog with a predicted role in retinal ganglion cell development.

Authors:  Nadean L Brown; Susan L Dagenais; Chuan-Min Chen; Tom Glaser
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 9.  Use with caution: developmental systems divergence and potential pitfalls of animal models.

Authors:  Vincent J Lynch
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2009-06

10.  An empirical test for branch-specific positive selection.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Nickel; David L Tefft; Karrie Goglin; Mark D Adams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.