Literature DB >> 9409661

Regulation of segmentation and segmental identity by Drosophila homeoproteins: the role of DNA binding in functional activity and specificity.

M D Biggin1, W McGinnis.   

Abstract

Recent advances have shed new light on how the Q50 homeoproteins act in Drosophila. These transcription factors have remarkably similar and promiscuous DNA-binding specificities in vitro; yet they each specify distinct developmental fates in vivo. One current model suggests that, because the Q50 homeoproteins have distinct biological functions, they must each regulate different target genes. According to this 'co-selective binding' model, significant binding of Q50 homeoproteins to functional DNA elements in vivo would be dependent upon cooperative interactions with other transcription factors (cofactors). If the Q50 homeoproteins each interact differently with cofactors, they could be selectively targeted to unique, limited subsets of their in vitro recognition sites and thus control different genes. However, a variety of experiments question this model. Molecular and genetic experiments suggest that the Q50 homeoproteins do not regulate very distinct sets of genes. Instead, they mostly control the expression of a large number of shared targets. The distinct morphogenic properties of the various Q50 homeoproteins may principally result from the different manners in which they either activate or repress these common targets. Further, in vivo binding studies indicate that at least two Q50 homeoproteins have very broad and similar DNA-binding specificities in embryos, a result that is inconsistent with the 'co-selective binding' model. Based on these and other data, we suggest that Q50 homeoproteins bind many of their recognition sites without the aid of cofactors. In this 'widespread binding' model, cofactors act mainly by helping to distinguish the way in which homeoproteins regulate targets to which they are already bound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9409661     DOI: 10.1242/dev.124.22.4425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  40 in total

1.  A comparison of in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding specificities suggests a new model for homeoprotein DNA binding in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  A Carr; M D Biggin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Target selectivity of bicoid is dependent on nonconsensus site recognition and protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  C Zhao; V Dave; F Yang; T Scarborough; J Ma
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Accessibility of transcriptionally inactive genes is specifically reduced at homeoprotein-DNA binding sites in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Carr; M D Biggin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Characterization of Hoxd1 protein-DNA-binding specificity using affinity chromatography and random DNA oligomer selection.

Authors:  P Kumar; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.046

5.  Role of intrinsic DNA binding specificity in defining target genes of the mammalian transcription factor PDX1.

Authors:  Arthur Liberzon; Gabriela Ridner; Michael D Walker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  ¹H, ¹³C and ¹⁵N chemical shift assignments for the human Pitx2 homeodomain in complex with a 22-base hairpin DNA.

Authors:  Thomas Doerdelmann; Douglas J Kojetin; Jamie M Baird-Titus; Mark Rance
Journal:  Biomol NMR Assign       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 0.746

7.  Cross-regulatory protein-protein interactions between Hox and Pax transcription factors.

Authors:  Serge Plaza; Frederic Prince; Yoshitsugu Adachi; Claudio Punzo; David L Cribbs; Walter J Gehring
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Homeobox Gene Deregulation: Impact on the Hallmarks of Cancer.

Authors:  Dhwani Haria; Honami Naora
Journal:  Cancer Hallm       Date:  2013-09-01

9.  Quantitative study of synthetic Hox transcription factor-DNA interactions in live cells.

Authors:  Vladana Vukojevic; Dimitrios K Papadopoulos; Lars Terenius; Walter J Gehring; Rudolf Rigler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Head-specific gene expression in Hydra: complexity of DNA- protein interactions at the promoter of ks1 is inversely correlated to the head activation potential.

Authors:  I Endl; J U Lohmann; T C Bosch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.