Literature DB >> 10350519

Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: results of two personal exposure studies.

R A Jenkins1, R W Counts.   

Abstract

Personal monitoring is a more accurate measure of individual exposure to airborne constituents because it incorporates human activity patterns and collects actual breathing zone samples to which subjects are exposed. Two recent studies conducted by our laboratory offer perspective on occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) from a personal exposure standpoint. In a study of nearly 1600 workers, levels of ETS were lower than or comparable to those in earlier studies. Limits on smoking in designated areas also acted to reduce overall exposure of workers. In facilities where smoking is permitted, ETS exposures are 10 to 20 times greater than in facilities in which smoking is banned. Service workers were exposed to higher levels of ETS than workers in white-collar occupations. For the narrower occupational category of waiters, waitresses, and bartenders, a second study in one urban location indicated that ETS levels to which wait staff are exposed are not considerably different from those exposure levels of subjects in the larger study who work in environments in which smoking is unrestricted. Bartenders were exposed to higher ETS levels, but there is a distinction between bartenders working in smaller facilities and those working in multiroom restaurant bars, with the former exposed to higher levels of ETS than the latter. In addition, ETS levels encountered by these more highly exposed workers are lower that those estimated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Concomitant area monitoring in the smaller study suggests that area samples can only be used to estimate individual personal exposure to within an order of magnitude or greater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10350519      PMCID: PMC1566263          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107s2341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  S K Hammond; G Sorensen; R Youngstrom; J K Ockene
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Occupational exposure of nonsmoking nightclub musicians to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  T A Bergman; D L Johnson; D T Boatright; K G Smallwood; R J Rando
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1996-08

3.  Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in sixteen cities in the United States as determined by personal breathing zone air sampling.

Authors:  R A Jenkins; A Palausky; R W Counts; C K Bayne; A B Dindal; M R Guerin
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec

4.  A personal monitoring study to assess workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  D B Coultas; J M Samet; J F McCarthy; J D Spengler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Involuntary smoking in the restaurant workplace. A review of employee exposure and health effects.

Authors:  M Siegel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  An enforceable indoor air quality standard for environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace.

Authors:  J L Repace; A H Lowrey
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.000

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  The descriptive epidemiology of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts: an analysis of the protection of restaurant customers and workers.

Authors:  M Skeer; M Siegel
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Long term compliance with California's Smoke-Free Workplace Law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  M D Weber; D A S Bagwell; J E Fielding; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Cultural factors related to smoking in San Francisco's Irish bars.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Tamar M J Antin; Juliet P Lee; Roland S Moore
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2009

4.  Workplace tobacco policy: progress on a winding road.

Authors:  M Eisenberg; J Ranger-Moore; K A Taylor; R A Hall; J Brown; H Lee
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

5.  Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in public places of European cities.

Authors:  M Nebot; M J López; G Gorini; M Neuberger; S Axelsson; M Pilali; C Fonseca; K Abdennbi; A Hackshaw; H Moshammer; A M Laurent; J Salles; M Georgouli; M C Fondelli; E Serrahima; F Centrich; S K Hammond
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses.

Authors:  John A Francis; Amy K Shea; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Effects of chloro-s-triazine herbicides and metabolites on aromatase activity in various human cell lines and on vitellogenin production in male carp hepatocytes.

Authors:  J T Sanderson; R J Letcher; M Heneweer; J P Giesy; M van den Berg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Quantification of ETS exposure in hospitality workers who have never smoked.

Authors:  Stefanie Kolb; Ulrike Brückner; Dennis Nowak; Katja Radon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  Exposure to secondhand smoke and excess lung cancer mortality risk among workers in the "5 B's": bars, bowling alleys, billiard halls, betting establishments, and bingo parlours.

Authors:  M Siegel; M Skeer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Acute sensory responses of nonsmokers at very low environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in controlled laboratory settings.

Authors:  M H Junker; B Danuser; C Monn; T Koller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.