Literature DB >> 8234955

An enforceable indoor air quality standard for environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace.

J L Repace1, A H Lowrey.   

Abstract

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has recently been determined by U.S. environmental and occupational health authorities to be a human carcinogen. We develop a model which permits using atmospheric nicotine measurements to estimate nonsmokers' ETS lung cancer risks in individual workplaces for the first time. We estimate that during the 1980s, the U.S. nonsmoking adult population's median nicotine lung exposure (homes and workplaces combined) was 143 micrograms (micrograms) of nicotine daily, and that most-exposed adult nonsmokers inhaled 1430 micrograms/day. These exposure estimates are validated by pharmacokinetic modeling which yields the corresponding steady-state dose of the nicotine metabolite, cotinine. For U.S. adult nonsmokers of working age, we estimate median cotinine values of about 1.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/ml) in plasma, and 6.2 ng/ml in urine; for most-exposed nonsmokers, we estimate cotinine concentrations of about 10 ng/ml in plasma and 62 ng/ml in urine. These values are consistent to within 15% of the cotinine values observed in contemporaneous clinical epidemiological studies. Corresponding median risk from ETS exposure in U.S. nonsmokers during the 1980s is estimated at about two lung cancer deaths (LCDs) per 1000 at risk, and for most-exposed nonsmokers, about two LCDs per 100. Risks abroad appear similar. Modeling of the lung cancer mortality risk from passive smoking suggests that de minimis [i.e., "acceptable" (10(-6))], risk occurs at an 8-hr time-weighted-average exposure concentration of 7.5 nanograms of ETS nicotine per cubic meter of workplace air for a working lifetime of 40 years. This model is based upon a linear exposure-response relationship validated by physical, clinical, and epidemiological data. From available data, it appears that workplaces without effective smoking policies considerably exceed this de minimis risk standard. For a substantial fraction of the 59 million nonsmoking workers in the U.S., current workplace exposure to ETS also appears to pose risks exceeding the de manifestis risk level above which carcinogens are strictly regulated by the federal government.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8234955     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00747.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  23 in total

1.  Smoke knows no boundaries: legal strategies for environmental tobacco smoke incursions into the home within multi-unit residential dwellings.

Authors:  R L Kline
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Costs of employee smoking in the workplace in Scotland.

Authors:  S Parrott; C Godfrey; M Raw
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA).

Authors:  J F Chriqui; M Frosh; R C Brownson; D M Shelton; R C Sciandra; R Hobart; P H Fisher; R el Arculli; M H Alciati
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Flying the smoky skies: secondhand smoke exposure of flight attendants.

Authors:  J Repace
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Comparison of indoor air quality in smoke-permitted and smoke-free multiunit housing: findings from the Boston Housing Authority.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Russo; Thomas E Hulse; Gary Adamkiewicz; Douglas E Levy; Leon Bethune; John Kane; Margaret Reid; Snehal N Shah
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Dietary nicotine. Won't mislead on passive smoking...

Authors:  J L Repace
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-01

7.  Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in public places of European cities.

Authors:  M Nebot; M J López; G Gorini; M Neuberger; S Axelsson; M Pilali; C Fonseca; K Abdennbi; A Hackshaw; H Moshammer; A M Laurent; J Salles; M Georgouli; M C Fondelli; E Serrahima; F Centrich; S K Hammond
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Secondhand smoke transfer in multiunit housing.

Authors:  Brian A King; Mark J Travers; K Michael Cummings; Martin C Mahoney; Andrew J Hyland
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis.

Authors:  N Hirschhorn; S A Bialous; S Shatenstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  Quantification of ETS exposure in hospitality workers who have never smoked.

Authors:  Stefanie Kolb; Ulrike Brückner; Dennis Nowak; Katja Radon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.