Literature DB >> 10350518

Exposure of U.S. workers to environmental tobacco smoke.

S K Hammond1.   

Abstract

The concentrations of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to which workers are exposed have been measured, using nicotine or other tracers, in diverse workplaces. Policies restricting workplace smoking to a few designated areas have been shown to reduce concentrations of ETS, although the effectiveness of such policies varies among work sites. Policies that ban smoking in the workplace are the most effective and generally lower all nicotine concentrations to less than 1 microg/m3; by contrast, mean concentrations measured in workplaces that allow smoking generally range from 2 to 6 microg/m3 in offices, from 3 to 8 microg/m3 in restaurants, and from 1 to 6 microg/m3 in the workplaces of blue-collar workers. Mean nicotine concentrations from 1 to 3 microg/m3 have been measured in the homes of smokers. Furthermore, workplace concentrations are highly variable, and some concentrations are more than 10 times higher than the average home levels, which have been established to cause lung cancer, heart disease, and other adverse health effects. For the approximately 30% of workers exposed to ETS in the workplace but not in the home, workplace exposure is the principal source of ETS. Among those with home exposures, exposures at work may exceed those resulting from home. We conclude that a significant number of U.S. workers are exposed to hazardous levels of ETS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10350518      PMCID: PMC1566276          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107s2329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  21 in total

1.  OSHA's permissible exposure limits: regulatory compliance versus health risk.

Authors:  R C Spear; S Selvin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  A personal monitoring study to assess workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  D B Coultas; J M Samet; J F McCarthy; J D Spengler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Markers of exposure to diesel exhaust and cigarette smoke in railroad workers.

Authors:  S K Hammond; T J Smith; S R Woskie; B P Leaderer; N Bettinger
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1988-10

4.  Home air nicotine levels and urinary cotinine excretion in preschool children.

Authors:  F W Henderson; H F Reid; R Morris; O L Wang; P C Hu; R W Helms; L Forehand; J Mumford; J Lewtas; N J Haley
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1989-07

5.  Passive smoking on commercial airline flights.

Authors:  M E Mattson; G Boyd; D Byar; C Brown; J F Callahan; D Corle; J W Cullen; J Greenblatt; N J Haley; K Hammond
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Estimation of personal exposure to tobacco smoke with a newly developed nicotine personal monitor.

Authors:  M Muramatsu; S Umemura; T Okada; H Tomita
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Indoor air pollution, tobacco smoke, and public health.

Authors:  J L Repace; A H Lowrey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Particulate and nicotine sampling in public facilities and offices.

Authors:  E A Miesner; S N Rudnick; F C Hu; J D Spengler; L Preller; H Ozkaynak; W Nelson
Journal:  JAPCA       Date:  1989-12

9.  Air nicotine and saliva cotinine as indicators of workplace passive smoking exposure and risk.

Authors:  J L Repace; J Jinot; S Bayard; K Emmons; S K Hammond
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 10.  Tracers for assessing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: what are they tracing?

Authors:  J M Daisey
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  40 in total

1.  Exposure of hospitality workers to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  M N Bates; J Fawcett; S Dickson; R Berezowski; N Garrett
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Passive smoking and its impact on employers and employees in Hong Kong.

Authors:  S M McGhee; A J Hedley; L M Ho
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  The descriptive epidemiology of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts: an analysis of the protection of restaurant customers and workers.

Authors:  M Skeer; M Siegel
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Long term compliance with California's Smoke-Free Workplace Law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  M D Weber; D A S Bagwell; J E Fielding; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Lung cancer risk and workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Leslie Stayner; James Bena; Annie J Sasco; Randall Smith; Kyle Steenland; Michaela Kreuzer; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Evidence secondhand smoke causes breast cancer in 2005 stronger than for lung cancer in 1986.

Authors:  K C Johnson; S A Glantz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Earlier age at menopause, work, and tobacco smoke exposure.

Authors:  Lora E Fleming; Silvina Levis; William G LeBlanc; Noella A Dietz; Kristopher L Arheart; James D Wilkinson; John Clark; Berrin Serdar; Evelyn P Davila; David J Lee
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Effectiveness of a smoke-free policy in lowering secondhand smoke concentrations in offices in China.

Authors:  Quan Gan; S Katharine Hammond; Yuan Jiang; Yan Yang; Teh-Wei Hu
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.162

9.  Pulmonary function abnormalities in never-smoking flight attendants exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke in the aircraft cabin.

Authors:  Mehrdad Arjomandi; Thaddeus Haight; Rita Redberg; Warren M Gold
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.162

10.  Environmental tobacco use and indicators of metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Bin Xie; Paula H Palmer; Zengchang Pang; Ping Sun; Haiping Duan; C Anderson Johnson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.