K C Johnson1, S A Glantz. 1. Evidence and Risk Assessment Division, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, 120 Colonnade Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9. Ken_LCDC_Johnson@phac-aspc.gc.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the strength of evidence from epidemiologic studies of secondhand smoke of the US Surgeon General's 1986 conclusion that secondhand smoke caused lung cancer with the California Environmental Protection Agency's (CalEPA) similar 2005 conclusion on breast cancer in younger, primarily premenopausal women. METHODS: We reviewed each report for criteria used to assess causality: numbers of studies, statistically significant increases in risk, and pooled summary risk estimates. RESULTS: Both the Surgeon General and CalEPA used updated Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causality and found that the evidence met those criteria. Six of 13 lung cancer studies (46%) had statistically significant increases (one of three cohort studies). Pooled risk estimates for lung cancer for spousal exposure were 1.53 for 10 combined case-control studies and 1.88 for seven studies with dose-response results. The CalEPA reported 10 of 14 studies (71%) had statistically significant increases in breast cancer risk (two of four cohort studies). Pooled relative risk estimates for younger, primarily premenopausal women were 1.68 (95% CI: 1.33, 2.12) for all exposed women and 2.19 (1.68, 2.84) for five studies with better exposure assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from epidemiologic studies of secondhand smoke in 2005 for breast cancer in younger, primarily premenopausal women was stronger than for lung cancer in 1986.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the strength of evidence from epidemiologic studies of secondhand smoke of the US Surgeon General's 1986 conclusion that secondhand smoke caused lung cancer with the California Environmental Protection Agency's (CalEPA) similar 2005 conclusion on breast cancer in younger, primarily premenopausal women. METHODS: We reviewed each report for criteria used to assess causality: numbers of studies, statistically significant increases in risk, and pooled summary risk estimates. RESULTS: Both the Surgeon General and CalEPA used updated Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causality and found that the evidence met those criteria. Six of 13 lung cancer studies (46%) had statistically significant increases (one of three cohort studies). Pooled risk estimates for lung cancer for spousal exposure were 1.53 for 10 combined case-control studies and 1.88 for seven studies with dose-response results. The CalEPA reported 10 of 14 studies (71%) had statistically significant increases in breast cancer risk (two of four cohort studies). Pooled relative risk estimates for younger, primarily premenopausal women were 1.68 (95% CI: 1.33, 2.12) for all exposed women and 2.19 (1.68, 2.84) for five studies with better exposure assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from epidemiologic studies of secondhand smoke in 2005 for breast cancer in younger, primarily premenopausal women was stronger than for lung cancer in 1986.
Authors: Mark D Miller; Melanie A Marty; Rachel Broadwin; Kenneth C Johnson; Andrew G Salmon; Bruce Winder; Craig Steinmaus Journal: Prev Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Kathleen M Egan; Meir J Stampfer; David Hunter; Susan Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Michelle Holmes; Walter C Willett; Graham A Colditz Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Peggy Reynolds; Susan Hurley; Debbie E Goldberg; Hoda Anton-Culver; Leslie Bernstein; Dennis Deapen; Pamela L Horn-Ross; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Ronald K Ross; Dee West; William E Wright; Argyrios Ziogas Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: N Hamajima; K Hirose; K Tajima; T Rohan; E E Calle; C W Heath; R J Coates; J M Liff; R Talamini; N Chantarakul; S Koetsawang; D Rachawat; A Morabia; L Schuman; W Stewart; M Szklo; C Bain; F Schofield; V Siskind; P Band; A J Coldman; R P Gallagher; T G Hislop; P Yang; L M Kolonel; A M Y Nomura; J Hu; K C Johnson; Y Mao; S De Sanjosé; N Lee; P Marchbanks; H W Ory; H B Peterson; H G Wilson; P A Wingo; K Ebeling; D Kunde; P Nishan; J L Hopper; G Colditz; V Gajalanski; N Martin; T Pardthaisong; S Silpisornkosol; C Theetranont; B Boosiri; S Chutivongse; P Jimakorn; P Virutamasen; C Wongsrichanalai; M Ewertz; H O Adami; L Bergkvist; C Magnusson; I Persson; J Chang-Claude; C Paul; D C G Skegg; G F S Spears; P Boyle; T Evstifeeva; J R Daling; W B Hutchinson; K Malone; E A Noonan; J L Stanford; D B Thomas; N S Weiss; E White; N Andrieu; A Brêmond; F Clavel; B Gairard; J Lansac; L Piana; R Renaud; A Izquierdo; P Viladiu; H R Cuevas; P Ontiveros; A Palet; S B Salazar; N Aristizabel; A Cuadros; L Tryggvadottir; H Tulinius; A Bachelot; M G Lê; J Peto; S Franceschi; F Lubin; B Modan; E Ron; Y Wax; G D Friedman; R A Hiatt; F Levi; T Bishop; K Kosmelj; M Primic-Zakelj; B Ravnihar; J Stare; W L Beeson; G Fraser; R D Bullbrook; J Cuzick; S W Duffy; I S Fentiman; J L Hayward; D Y Wang; A J McMichael; K McPherson; R L Hanson; M C Leske; M C Mahoney; P C Nasca; A O Varma; A L Weinstein; T R Moller; H Olsson; J Ranstam; R A Goldbohm; P A van den Brandt; R A Apelo; J Baens; J R de la Cruz; B Javier; L B Lacaya; C A Ngelangel; C La Vecchia; E Negri; E Marubini; M Ferraroni; M Gerber; S Richardson; C Segala; D Gatei; P Kenya; A Kungu; J G Mati; L A Brinton; R Hoover; C Schairer; R Spirtas; H P Lee; M A Rookus; F E van Leeuwen; J A Schoenberg; M McCredie; M D Gammon; E A Clarke; L Jones; A Neil; M Vessey; D Yeates; P Appleby; E Banks; V Beral; D Bull; B Crossley; A Goodill; J Green; C Hermon; T Key; N Langston; C Lewis; G Reeves; R Collins; R Doll; R Peto; K Mabuchi; D Preston; P Hannaford; C Kay; L Rosero-Bixby; Y T Gao; F Jin; J-M Yuan; H Y Wei; T Yun; C Zhiheng; G Berry; J Cooper Booth; T Jelihovsky; R MacLennan; R Shearman; Q-S Wang; C-J Baines; A B Miller; C Wall; E Lund; H Stalsberg; X O Shu; W Zheng; K Katsouyanni; A Trichopoulou; D Trichopoulos; A Dabancens; L Martinez; R Molina; O Salas; F E Alexander; K Anderson; A R Folsom; B S Hulka; L Bernstein; S Enger; R W Haile; A Paganini-Hill; M C Pike; R K Ross; G Ursin; M C Yu; M P Longnecker; P Newcomb; L Bergkvist; A Kalache; T M M Farley; S Holck; O Meirik Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-11-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Inger T Gram; Song-Yi Park; Gertraud Maskarinec; Lynne R Wilkens; Christopher A Haiman; Loïc Le Marchand Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Senamile P Ngobese; Catherine O Egbe; Mukhethwa Londani; Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.390