Literature DB >> 12468752

Passive smoking and its impact on employers and employees in Hong Kong.

S M McGhee1, A J Hedley, L M Ho.   

Abstract

AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of passive smoking at work in the whole workforce in Hong Kong (population 6.8 million), the characteristics of the passive smokers, any extra use of health care among passive smokers, and who pays for that health care.
METHODS: A random sample of 14,325 households was contacted by telephone; 6,186 responding adults who worked full time were asked about their employment, their most recent use of health care and the cost of that care, their medical benefits, and their exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace. After weighting the sample for sex, age, household size, and income, 4,739 subjects were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: Of 1,961 full time workers who did not smoke, 47.5% were exposed to secondhand smoke in the workplace compared with only 26% exposed at home. Exposure at work was associated with being younger, male, married, less educated, and having a lower income. Those exposed at work were 37% more likely to report having visited a doctor for a respiratory illness in the previous 14 days. Employers were paying 28% of the cost of these visits, the government paid 8%, and the individuals paid 63%. If extrapolated to the 3 million workers in the Hong Kong population, employers would pay just over US$9 million per year, while the affected workers would pay around US$20 million.
CONCLUSION: As well as the costs of active smoking, the cost of extra health care utilisation associated with passive smoking is an additional cost being paid by those employers who have not established smoke free workplaces and by their employees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12468752      PMCID: PMC1763597          DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.12.842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  10 in total

1.  Occupational exposure to carcinogens in the European Union.

Authors:  T Kauppinen; J Toikkanen; D Pedersen; R Young; W Ahrens; P Boffetta; J Hansen; H Kromhout; J Maqueda Blasco; D Mirabelli; V de la Orden-Rivera; B Pannett; N Plato; A Savela; R Vincent; M Kogevinas
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in the home and worksite and health effects in adults: results from the 1991 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  D M Mannino; M Siegel; D Rose; J Nkuchia; R Etzel
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Heart disease from passive smoking in the workplace.

Authors:  A J Wells
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  How much can business expect to profit from smoking cessation?

Authors:  M M Kristein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Respiratory illness in nonsmokers chronically exposed to tobacco smoke in the work place.

Authors:  J R White; H F Froeb; J A Kulik
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Environmental tobacco smoke exposure among police officers in Hong Kong.

Authors:  T H Lam; L M Ho; A J Hedley; P Adab; R Fielding; S M McGhee; L Aharonson-Daniel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Passive smoking at work: the short-term cost.

Authors:  S M McGhee; P Adab; A J Hedley; T H Lam; L M Ho; R Fielding; C M Wong
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Association of environmental tobacco smoke exposure with socioeconomic status in a population of 7725 New Zealanders.

Authors:  G Whitlock; S MacMahon; S Vander Hoorn; P Davis; R Jackson; R Norton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Exposure of the US population to environmental tobacco smoke: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1991.

Authors:  J L Pirkle; K M Flegal; J T Bernert; D J Brody; R A Etzel; K R Maurer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Exposure of U.S. workers to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  S K Hammond
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Passive smoking: secondhand smoke does cause respiratory disease.

Authors:  A J Hedley; T H Lam; S M McGhee; G M Leung; M Pow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-30

2.  Cost of tobacco-related diseases, including passive smoking, in Hong Kong.

Authors:  S M McGhee; L M Ho; H M Lapsley; J Chau; W L Cheung; S Y Ho; M Pow; T H Lam; A J Hedley
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Quantification of ETS exposure in hospitality workers who have never smoked.

Authors:  Stefanie Kolb; Ulrike Brückner; Dennis Nowak; Katja Radon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Social Inequalities in Secondhand Smoke Among Japanese Non-smokers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuyama; Jun Aida; Toru Tsuboya; Shihoko Koyama; Yukihiro Sato; Atsushi Hozawa; Ken Osaka
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.211

5.  A Comprehensive Tobacco Control Policy Program in a Mining Industry in Indonesia: Did It Work?

Authors:  Yayi S Prabandari; Bagas S Bintoro; Purwanta Purwanta
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-24

6.  The prevalence of household second-hand smoke exposure and its correlated factors in six counties of China.

Authors:  C-P Wang; S J Ma; X F Xu; J-F Wang; C Z Mei; G-H Yang
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 7.552

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.