Literature DB >> 10348145

Radial force of coronary stents: a comparative analysis.

R Rieu1, P Barragan, C Masson, J Fuseri, V Garitey, M Silvestri, P Roquebert, J Sainsous.   

Abstract

High radial force has become an essential feature of new coronary stents. These stents are expected to exhibit sufficient radial force and minimum radial recoil when deployed in atheromatous lesions of various morphologies. The aim of this study was to compare the radial force of 17 coronary stents in vitro (Anglodynamics, ACS Multilink, AVE Micro II and GFX, Bard XT, Biocompatibles PC, Cook GR II, Cordis Crossflex, Hexacath Freedom, Johnson & Johnson PS 153'PS 154, and Crown, Medtronic Wiktor and BeStent BEL-15, Saint-Come SC 1616, Scimed Nir 7 and 9). Two in vitro mechanical tests were performed to assess the stent radial force. The first test measured the deformation of coronary stents in a V-stand by using a deformation controlled by a dynamometer based on a longitudinal generatrix. The precision was of 1 micron. This comparative test highlighted the appreciable variation in behavior of the range of tested stents in terms of resistance to local compression. The line graphs obtained show a very small (and in some cases nonexistent) purely elastic behavior area in the stents, with this result reflecting a small (<0.4 Newtons) range of forces applied to all stents. Above this value, the stents did not return to their size before compression and the line graph remains approximately linear for a long period. It was therefore possible to distinguish between two families of stents on the basis of the presence or absence of this elastic area. In the second test, the stent was deployed in a 3.0-mm elastic tube and a pressure gradient created between the interior and exterior of the tube. The precision was of 50 microns. A typical line graph of the pressure-diameter relationship was recognizable for a given stent. No difference in behavior between the different coronary stents was noted up to 0.3 x 10(5) Pa; subsequently, after 0.3 x 10(5) Pa, sizable deformation differences were visible between the least resistant stent, the BeStent BEL-15, and the most resistant stent, the Crossflex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10348145     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199903)46:3<380::AID-CCD27>3.0.CO;2-J

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  11 in total

1.  Mechanism of lumen enlargement with direct stenting versus predilatation stenting: influence of remodelling and plaque characteristics assessed by volumetric intracoronary ultrasound.

Authors:  G Finet; N J Weissman; G S Mintz; L F Satler; K M Kent; J R Laird; G A Adelmann; A E Ajani; M T Castagna; G Rioufol; A D Pichard
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Mechanical behavior of fully expanded commercially available endovascular coronary stents.

Authors:  Josip Tambaca; Suncica Canic; Mate Kosor; R David Fish; David Paniagua
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

3.  Long term angiographic and clinical follow up in patients with stent implantation for symptomatic myocardial bridging.

Authors:  P K Haager; E R Schwarz; J vom Dahl; H G Klues; T Reffelmann; P Hanrath
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Stent collapse caused by balloon occlusion and aspiration system in saphenous vein graft intervention.

Authors:  Morihiko Takeda; Nobuyuki Shiba
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2017-07-17

5.  Angioplasty and Stenting of Distal Anastomotic Stenosis of Femoropopliteal Bypass Graft Using Helical Interwoven Nitinol Stents.

Authors:  Yiu Che Chan; Stephen Cheng
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-08-19

6.  Is coronary stent deployment and remodeling affected by predilatation? An intravascular ultrasound randomized study Stenting with or without predilation: an IVUS study.

Authors:  Jacques Boschat; Hervé Le Breton; P Commeau; Bernard Huret; Marc Bedossa; Martine Gilard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Thermomechanical properties, collapse pressure, and expansion of shape memory polymer neurovascular stent prototypes.

Authors:  Géraldine M Baer; Thomas S Wilson; Ward Small; Jonathan Hartman; William J Benett; Dennis L Matthews; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  Biodegradable Cable-Tie Rapamycin-eluting Stents.

Authors:  Cheng-Hung Lee; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Shang-Hung Chang; Chang-Lin Chiang; Ching-Lung Fan; Shih-Jung Liu; Wei-Jan Chen; Chao-Jan Wang; Ming-Yi Hsu; Kuo-Chun Hung; Chung-Chuan Chou; Po-Cheng Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Fabrication and Optimal Design of Biodegradable Polymeric Stents for Aneurysms Treatments.

Authors:  Xue Han; Xia Wu; Michael Kelly; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-02-28

10.  Comparison of acute recoil between bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid XINSORB stent and metallic stent in porcine model.

Authors:  Yizhe Wu; Li Shen; Qibing Wang; Lei Ge; Jian Xie; Xi Hu; Aijun Sun; Juying Qian; Junbo Ge
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.