Literature DB >> 19262715

Screening techniques for prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population.

Hana Strul1, Nadir Arber.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, with more than 1,000,000 new cases and 500,000 deaths occurring annually. CRC has a natural history of transition from normal mucosa through adenoma to malignant lesion that spans, on average, 15 to 20 years, providing a window of opportunity for effective prevention and intervention through routine screening. The optimal screening strategy for the average-risk population aged >/= 50 years remains the subject of debate, however. Endoscopic screening is undoubtedly the most effective screening method, and is also therapeutic since it permits polyp removal. The simplest and best-evaluated available screening method is the fecal occult blood test, which is relatively inexpensive and noninvasive, but less accurate than colonoscopy. This method detects cancer at an early stage but, since precancerous polyps rarely bleed, it is not suitable for disease prevention. Compliance with current screening methods is a major barrier to optimal prevention. Several new screening modalities, such as self-navigating colonoscopes, prepless virtual colonoscopy, and stool genetic testing, may improve compliance. Until these technologies are available or shown to be appropriate for routine screening, however, conventional colonoscopy remains the most efficient method for CRC screening and prevention.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19262715      PMCID: PMC2632817     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res        ISSN: 1934-7820


  83 in total

1.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The findings and impact of nonrehydrated guaiac examination of the rectum (FINGER) study: a comparison of 2 methods of screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic average-risk patients.

Authors:  E J Bini; R C Rajapaksa; E H Weinshel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-09-27

4.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.

Authors:  Michael Macari; Edmund J Bini; Xiaonan Xue; Andrew Milano; Seth S Katz; Daniel Resnick; Hersh Chandarana; Glen Krinsky; Klaus Klingenbeck; Christopher H Marshall; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Wireless capsule video endoscopy: three years of experience.

Authors:  Rami Eliakim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Kenneth Song; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  The anatomic range of examination by fibreoptic rectosigmoidoscopy (60 centimetres).

Authors:  J Jensen; J Kewenter; J Swedenborg
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans.

Authors:  A D Müller; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-09-11

9.  CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Martina M Morrin; Jonathan B Kruskal; Philip T Lavin; Max P Rosen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Bergein F Overholt; Terry Box; Cynthia Kelsey Winker
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Non-coding RNAs as emerging regulators and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chandra Kishore; Devarajan Karunagaran
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  A report of the frequency of colorectal carcinoma and involved lymph nodes in South-West Iran.

Authors:  Hodjatollah Shahbazian; Yaser Nasuri; Seyed Mohammad Hosseini; Shoaleh Arvandi; Samira Razzaghi
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

3.  Identification of colorectal cancer associated biomarkers: an integrated analysis of miRNA expression.

Authors:  André Fonseca; Sara Ventura Ramalhete; André Mestre; Ricardo Pires das Neves; Ana Marreiros; Pedro Castelo-Branco; Vânia Palma Roberto
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Rapid colonoscopy preparation using bolus lukewarm saline combined with sequential posture changes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vijaypal Arya; Kalpana A Gupta; Ashok Valluri; Swarn V Arya; Martin L Lesser
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.