Literature DB >> 10341954

Reading with simulated scotomas: attending to the right is better than attending to the left.

E M Fine1, G S Rubin.   

Abstract

Persons with central field loss must learn to read using eccentric retina. To do this, most adopt a preferred retinal locus (PRL), which substitutes for the fovea. Patients who have central field loss due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), most often adopt PRL adjacent to and to the left of their scotoma in visual field space. It has been hypothesized that this arrangement of PRL and scotoma would benefit reading. We tested this hypothesis by asking normally-sighted subjects to read with the left or right half of their visual field plus 3.2 degrees in the contralateral field masked from view. Letter identification, word identification, and reading were all slower when only the information in the left visual field was available. This was primarily due to the number of saccades required to successfully read to stimuli. These data imply that patients would be better off with PRL to the right of their scotoma than to the left for the purposes of reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10341954     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00208-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Face Fields and Microperimetry for Estimating the Location of Fixation in Eyes with Macular Disease.

Authors:  Janet S Sunness
Journal:  J Vis Impair Blind       Date:  2008-11

2.  How spatial orientation of Japanese text affects fixation points in patients with bilateral macular atrophy.

Authors:  Yoko Matsumoto; Mitsuko Yuzawa; Koichi Oda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Krishnan; Hope M Queener; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Reading performance and central field loss.

Authors:  E Kanonidou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Directional processing within the perceptual span during visual target localization.

Authors:  Harold H Greene; Alexander Pollatsek; Kathleen Masserang; Yen Ju Lee; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss.

Authors:  Sing-Hang Cheung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Simulation of a central scotoma using contact lenses with an opaque centre.

Authors:  Essam S Almutleb; Arthur Bradley; Jason Jedlicka; Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Camille Morvan; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Relationship between visual span and reading performance in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Allen M Y Cheong; Gordon E Legge; Mary G Lawrence; Sing-Hang Cheung; Mary A Ruff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The effect of normal aging and age-related macular degeneration on perceptual learning.

Authors:  Andrew T Astle; Alan J Blighe; Ben S Webb; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.