Literature DB >> 10341934

Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events.

K Watanabe1, S Shimojo.   

Abstract

Identical visual targets moving across each other with equal and constant speed can be perceived either to bounce off or to stream through each other. This bistable motion perception has been studied mostly in the context of motion integration. Since the perception of most ambiguous motion is affected by attention, there is the possibility of attentional modulation occurring in this case as well. We investigated whether distraction of attention from the moving targets would alter the relative frequency of each percept. During the observation of the streaming/bouncing motion event in the peripheral visual field, visual attention was disrupted by an abrupt presentation of a visual distractor at various timings and locations (experiment 1; exogenous distraction of attention) or by the demand of an additional discrimination task (experiments 2 and 3; endogenous distraction of attention). Both types of distractions of attention increased the frequency of the bouncing percept and decreased that of the streaming percept. These results suggest that attention may facilitate the perception of object motion as continuing in the same direction as in the past.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10341934     DOI: 10.1068/p271041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  21 in total

1.  Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Shared attentional resources for global and local motion processing.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Retinotopically defined primary visual cortex in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Rosanna K Olsen; J Shane Kippenhan; Shruti Japee; Philip Kohn; Carolyn B Mervis; Ziad S Saad; Colleen A Morris; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Action and attentional load can influence aperture effects on motion perception.

Authors:  Patricia R DeLucia; Tammy E Ott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cognitive binding in schizophrenia: weakened integration of temporal intersensory information.

Authors:  Wolfgang Tschacher; Claudia Bergomi
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  The development of multisensory speech perception continues into the late childhood years.

Authors:  Lars A Ross; Sophie Molholm; Daniella Blanco; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Dave Saint-Amour; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Tactile stimulation disambiguates the perception of visual motion paths.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Simon Merz; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

8.  Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  BOLD response during visual perception of biological motion in obsessive-compulsive disorder : an fMRI study using the dynamic point-light animation paradigm.

Authors:  Wi Hoon Jung; Bon-Mi Gu; Do-Hyung Kang; Ji-Young Park; So Young Yoo; Chi-Hoon Choi; Jong-Min Lee; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Agnès Alsius; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.