Literature DB >> 29663306

Tactile stimulation disambiguates the perception of visual motion paths.

Hauke S Meyerhoff1, Simon Merz2, Christian Frings2.   

Abstract

Although visual perception traditionally has been considered to be impenetrable by non-visual information, there are a rising number of reports discussing cross-modal influences on visual perception. In two experiments, we investigated how coinciding vibrotactile stimulation affects the perception of two discs that move toward each other, superimpose in the center of the screen, and then move apart. Whereas two discs streaming past each other was the dominant impression when the visual event was presented in isolation, a brief coinciding vibrotactile stimulation at the moment of overlap biased the visual impression toward two discs bouncing off each other (Experiment 1). Further, the vibrotactile stimulation actually changed perceptual processing by reducing the amount of perceived overlap between the discs (Experiment 2), which has been demonstrated to be associated with a higher proportion of bouncing impressions. We propose that tactile-induced quantitative changes in the visual percept might alter the quality of the visual percept (from streaming to bouncing), thereby adding to the understanding of how cross-modal information interacts with early visual perception and how this interaction influences subsequent visual impressions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bouncing/streaming illusion; Illusory crescent; Tactile transients; Visual-tactile interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663306     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1467-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud Falchier; Simon Clavagnier; Pascal Barone; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: sensory interaction versus response bias.

Authors:  Eric C Odgaard; Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

3.  Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: attention alone does not explain why the discs are bouncing.

Authors:  Massimo Grassi; Clara Casco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The stream/bounce effect occurs for luminance- and disparity-defined motion targets.

Authors:  Philip M Grove; Yousuke Kawachi; Sakurai Kenzo
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Auditory induced bounce perception persists as the probability of a motion reversal is reduced.

Authors:  Philip M Grove; Kenzo Sakurai
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The role of visual-auditory "compellingness" in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses.

Authors:  D H Warren; R B Welch; T J McCarthy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

7.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

8.  When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Anna Amendt; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Causation From Perception.

Authors:  Lance J Rips
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

10.  Tactile--visual temporal ventriloquism: no effect of spatial disparity.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Tactile temporal offset cues reduce visual representational momentum.

Authors:  Simon Merz; Christian Frings; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.