Literature DB >> 21618015

Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the cross-sectional area of the muscle contractile and non-contractile components.

Olivier Gille1, Mathieu-Panchoa de Sèze, Patrick Guérin, Erwan Jolivet, Jean-Marc Vital, Wafa Skalli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to study skeletal muscles patients with muscular disorders. We report an MRI technique for evaluating the trunk muscles. This technique takes both the component surface area (CSA) and the density of the muscles on MRI axial slices into account . Using a computer-based image analysis system, we combined MRI data measuring the muscle CSA, which was separated into the contractile component (CCSA) and the non-contractile component (NCCSA). The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability of this method of measuring the CSA, CCSA and NCCSA in trunk muscles on MRI axial slices through L4 and T12.
METHODS: Thirty volunteer subjects were enrolled in this study. Two acquisitions were performed. For the reliability analyses, each of the two slices (T12 and L4) from 30 subjects was measured by three raters trained in this technique, on two occasions 2 weeks apart. Each muscle was surrounded and its CSA, NCCSA and CCSA were recorded. For each muscle, the agreement between the two sets of 30 measurements performed by three observers was evaluated by calculating an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: Regarding the slice through L4 and T12, the reliabilities of the measurement of CSA, CCSA were very good for all the muscles except the parietal muscles.
CONCLUSION: MRI measurements of the trunk muscle cross-sectional areas and of the CCSA and NCCSA are reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21618015     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-011-0825-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  44 in total

1.  CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The comparison of trunk muscles EMG activation between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during flexion-extension and lateral bending tasks.

Authors:  C Larivière; D Gagnon; P Loisel
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Anatomical study of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Raphaël Vialle; C Court; N Khouri; E Olivier; L Miladi; J L Tassin; T Defives; J Dubousset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anatomical optimization of skin electrode placement to record electromyographic activity of erector spinae muscles.

Authors:  Mathieu Panchoa de Sèze; Jean-René Cazalets
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Relationships between myoelectric activity, strength, and MRI of lumbar extensor muscles in back pain patients and normal subjects.

Authors:  V Mooney; J Gulick; M Perlman; D Levy; R Pozos; S Leggett; D Resnick
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-08

6.  Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  R Gejo; H Matsui; Y Kawaguchi; H Ishihara; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar muscle usage in chronic low back pain. Magnetic resonance image evaluation.

Authors:  P L Flicker; J L Fleckenstein; K Ferry; J Payne; C Ward; T Mayer; R W Parkey; R M Peshock
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Trunk muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and density in patients with chronic low back pain randomized to lumbar fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Keller; Jens I Brox; Ragnhild Gunderson; Inger Holm; Astrid Friis; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effect of comprehensive group training on cross-sectional area, density, and strength of paraspinal muscles in patients sick-listed for subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Inger Holm; Ragnhild Gunderson; Jens Ivar Brox; Kari Bø
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-06

10.  The value of electromyography of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in discriminating between chronic-low-back-pain sufferers and normal subjects.

Authors:  Anthony R Humphrey; Antoni V F Nargol; Anthony P C Jones; Amy A Ratcliffe; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantification of trunk and android lean mass using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry compared to magnetic resonance imaging after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kathleen C Rankin; Laura C O'Brien; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.985

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.