Literature DB >> 10326260

What do general practice receptionists think and feel about their work?

M Eisner1, N Britten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there is some published work acknowledging that the general practice receptionist's role is both important and difficult, receptionists' own views have rarely been sought. AIM: To explore general practice receptionists' ideas and feelings about their work.
METHOD: A questionnaire was distributed to all 150 receptionists in a representative sample of 26 practices in the area covered by Leeds family health services authority. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a representative group of 20 receptionists selected from the questionnaire sample.
RESULTS: All responders were women, 60% were over 40 years old, and about half had been in the post for more than five years; four-fifths worked part-time. They had chosen the job because it dovetailed with the rest of their lives. Responders derived satisfaction from helping patients, meeting people, having good relationships with colleagues, and doing varied work. Sources of stress included difficult patients, work pressure, problems finding appointments for patients, and feeling caught between doctors' and patients' demands. Responders' experiences and views of training were diverse. Practice managers were important in making them feel consulted and supported. All had a sense of teamwork with colleagues, but many did not perceive the whole practice as a team. Many felt doctors failed to appreciate the pressure and complexity of their work.
CONCLUSIONS: Receptionists' work is complex, demanding and intense, involving a high level of commitment to patients, colleagues, and the practice. Recommendations include improved appointment systems, a positive role for practice managers in relation to reception staff, and individual planning of receptionists' training. Effective teamwork among receptionists should be recognized and developed. General practitioners (GPs) are recommended to develop a greater understanding of receptionists' work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10326260      PMCID: PMC1313342     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  9 in total

1.  Towards better practice management: a national survey of Scottish general practice management.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; H Youngs
Journal:  J Manag Med       Date:  1994

2.  Modifying the behaviour of doctors and their receptionists in recurrent stressful situations.

Authors:  J F Middleton
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-02

Review 3.  Rigour and qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

4.  Why do qualitative research?

Authors:  R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-01

5.  The primary health care non-team.

Authors:  P Pearson; K Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-26

6.  Patients' difficulties in obtaining appointments--a general practice audit.

Authors:  C M Fishbacher; R A Robertson
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-06

7.  The role of the receptionist in general practice: a 'dragon behind the desk'?

Authors:  S Arber; L Sawyer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Human resource management in general practice: survey of current practice.

Authors:  J Newton; J Hunt; J Stirling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Practice receptionists: poorly trained and taken for granted?

Authors:  J P Copeman; T D Van Zwanenberg
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-01
  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  Changes in receptionists' attitudes towards involvement in a general practice-based trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention.

Authors:  C A Lock; E F Kaner; N Heather; E Gilvarry; B R McAvoy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Being a good clinician is not enough: doctors as employers and practices as organisations.

Authors:  Kath Checkland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Christine Sinsky
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  How could health information exchange better meet the needs of care practitioners?

Authors:  P Kierkegaard; R Kaushal; J R Vest
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model: An Overview and Operational Definition.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Reiter; Anne C Dobmeyer; Christopher L Hunter
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2018-06

6.  Managing patient demand: a qualitative study of appointment making in general practice.

Authors:  M Gallagher; P Pearson; C Drinkwater; J Guy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Front desk talk: discourse analysis of receptionist-patient interaction.

Authors:  Heather Hewitt; Lucy McCloughan; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Health care assistants in primary care depression management: role perception, burdening factors, and disease conception.

Authors:  Jochen Gensichen; Cornelia Jaeger; Monika Peitz; Marion Torge; Corina Güthlin; Karola Mergenthal; Vera Kleppel; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Juliana J Petersen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Missed appointments in primary care: questionnaire and focus group study of health professionals.

Authors:  Mahvash Husain-Gambles; Richard D Neal; Owen Dempsey; Debbie A Lawlor; Jim Hodgson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Managing violence in primary care: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Nat M Wright; Cath A Dixon; Charlotte N Tompkins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.