PURPOSE: In primary care, the involvement of health care assistants (HCAs) in clinical depression management is an innovative approach. Little is known, however, about how HCAs experience their new tasks. We wanted to describe the perceptions and experiences of HCAs who provided case management to patients with depression in small primary care practices. METHODS: This qualitative study was nested in the Primary Care Monitoring for Depressive Patients Trial on case management in Germany. We used a semi-structured instrument to interview 26 HCAs and undertook content analysis. We focussed on 3 key aspects: role perception, burdening factors, and disease conception. RESULTS: Most HCAs said their new role provided them with personal and professional enrichment, and they were interested in improving patient-communication skills. They saw their major function as interacting with the patient and considered support for the family physician to be of less importance. Even so, some saw their role as a communication facilitator between family physician and patient. Burdening factors implementing the new tasks were the increased workload, the work environment, and difficulties interacting with depressed patients. HCAs' disease conception of depression was heterogeneous. After 1 year HCAs believed they were sufficiently familiar with their duties as case managers in depression management. CONCLUSION: HCAs were willing to extend their professional responsibilities from administrative work to more patient-centred work. Even if HCAs perform only monitoring tasks within the case management concept, the resulting workload is a limiting factor.
PURPOSE: In primary care, the involvement of health care assistants (HCAs) in clinical depression management is an innovative approach. Little is known, however, about how HCAs experience their new tasks. We wanted to describe the perceptions and experiences of HCAs who provided case management to patients with depression in small primary care practices. METHODS: This qualitative study was nested in the Primary Care Monitoring for DepressivePatients Trial on case management in Germany. We used a semi-structured instrument to interview 26 HCAs and undertook content analysis. We focussed on 3 key aspects: role perception, burdening factors, and disease conception. RESULTS: Most HCAs said their new role provided them with personal and professional enrichment, and they were interested in improving patient-communication skills. They saw their major function as interacting with the patient and considered support for the family physician to be of less importance. Even so, some saw their role as a communication facilitator between family physician and patient. Burdening factors implementing the new tasks were the increased workload, the work environment, and difficulties interacting with depressedpatients. HCAs' disease conception of depression was heterogeneous. After 1 year HCAs believed they were sufficiently familiar with their duties as case managers in depression management. CONCLUSION: HCAs were willing to extend their professional responsibilities from administrative work to more patient-centred work. Even if HCAs perform only monitoring tasks within the case management concept, the resulting workload is a limiting factor.
Authors: David A Richards; Annette J Lankshear; Janine Fletcher; Anne Rogers; Michael Barkham; Pete Bower; Linda Gask; Simon Gilbody; Karina Lovell Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Paul A Nutting; Kaia M Gallagher; Kim Riley; Suzanne White; Allen J Dietrich; W Perry Dickinson Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2006-09-13
Authors: Jochen Gensichen; Monika Peitz; Marion Torge; Jutta Mosig-Frey; Heike Wendt-Hermainski; Thomas Rosemann; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Bernd Löwe Journal: Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich Date: 2006
Authors: Carolyn A Chew-Graham; Karina Lovell; Chris Roberts; Robert Baldwin; Michael Morley; Alistair Burns; David Richards; Heather Burroughs Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jochen Gensichen; Marion Torge; Monika Peitz; Heike Wendt-Hermainski; Martin Beyer; Thomas Rosemann; Christian Krauth; Heiner Raspe; Josef B Aldenhoff; Ferdinand M Gerlach Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Tobias Freund; Michel Wensing; Cornelia Mahler; Jochen Gensichen; Antje Erler; Martin Beyer; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Joachim Szecsenyi; Frank Peters-Klimm Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Neeltje van den Berg; Romy Heymann; Claudia Meinke; Sebastian E Baumeister; Steffen Flessa; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Michelle Grunauer; David Schrock; Eric Fabara; Gabriela Jimenez; Aimee Miller; Zongshan Lai; Amy Kilbourne; Melvin G McInnis Journal: Int J Family Med Date: 2014-02-17
Authors: Christiane Muth; Sebastian Harder; Lorenz Uhlmann; Justine Rochon; Birgit Fullerton; Corina Güthlin; Antje Erler; Martin Beyer; Marjan van den Akker; Rafael Perera; André Knottnerus; Jose M Valderas; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Walter E Haefeli Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 2.692