Literature DB >> 25589903

How could health information exchange better meet the needs of care practitioners?

P Kierkegaard1, R Kaushal2, J R Vest3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health information exchange (HIE) has the potential to improve the quality of healthcare by enabling providers with better access to patient information from multiple sources at the point of care. However, HIE efforts have historically been difficult to establish in the US and the failure rates of organizations created to foster HIE have been high.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to better understand how RHIO-based HIE systems were used in practice and the challenges care practitioners face using them. The objective of our study were to so investigate how HIE can better meet the needs of care practitioners.
METHODS: We performed a multiple-case study using qualitative methods in three communities in New York State. We conducted interviews onsite and by telephone with HIE users and non-users and observed the workflows of healthcare professionals at multiple healthcare organizations participating in a local HIE effort in New York State.
RESULTS: The empirical data analysis suggests that challenges still remain in increasing provider usage, optimizing HIE implementations and connecting HIE systems across geographic regions. Important determinants of system usage and perceived value includes users experienced level of available information and the fit of use for physician workflows.
CONCLUSIONS: Challenges still remain in increasing provider adoption, optimizing HIE implementations, and demonstrating value. The inability to find information reduced usage of HIE. Healthcare organizations, HIE facilitating organizations, and states can help support HIE adoption by ensuring patient information is accessible to providers through increasing patient consents, fostering broader participation, and by ensuring systems are usable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health information exchange; community; consent model; evaluation studies; information systems

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25589903      PMCID: PMC4287667          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2014-06-RA-0055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  42 in total

1.  Health information technology and the idea of informed consent.

Authors:  Melissa M Goldstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Larry D Gamm
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Pilot implementation of health information systems: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Jørgen P Bansler; Erling Havn
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy.

Authors:  Georgia Robins Sadler; Hau-Chen Lee; Rod Seung-Hwan Lim; Judith Fullerton
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Health care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Authors:  Robert Steinbrook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  U.S. Regional health information organizations: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; David W Bates; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  HEAL NY: Promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Yolanda Barron; Erika L Abramson; Vaishali Patel; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption.

Authors:  Stephen E Ross; Lisa M Schilling; Douglas H Fernald; Arthur J Davidson; David R West
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  Immunization information system opt-in consent: at what cost?

Authors:  Julie A Boom; Leila C Sahni; Cynthia S Nelson; Anna C Dragsbaek; Luisa Franzini
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

10.  Success in health information exchange projects: solving the implementation puzzle.

Authors:  Claude Sicotte; Guy Paré
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  16 in total

1.  Preparing Nursing Homes for the Future of Health Information Exchange.

Authors:  G L Alexander; M Rantz; C Galambos; A Vogelsmeier; M Flesner; L Popejoy; J Mueller; S Shumate; M Elvin
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  The Association Between State-Level Health Information Exchange Laws and Hospital Participation in Community Health Information Organizations.

Authors:  Brittany L Brown-Podgorski; Katy Ellis Hilts; Bita A Kash; Cason D Schmit; Joshua R Vest
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  The associations between query-based and directed health information exchange with potentially avoidable use of health care services.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Mark Aaron Unruh; Jason S Shapiro; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Adoption of a Nationwide Shared Medical Record in France: Lessons Learnt after 5 Years of Deployment.

Authors:  Brigitte Séroussi; Jacques Bouaud
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Organizational Uses of Health Information Exchange to Change Cost and Utilization Outcomes: A Typology from a Multi-Site Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Erika Abramson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

6.  The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Mark A Unruh; Lawrence P Casalino; Jason S Shapiro
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Barriers and facilitators to exchanging health information: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karen B Eden; Annette M Totten; Steven Z Kassakian; Paul N Gorman; Marian S McDonagh; Beth Devine; Miranda Pappas; Monica Daeges; Susan Woods; William R Hersh
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 8.  A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kelsey Flott; Ryan Callahan; Ara Darzi; Erik Mayer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Health information exchange associated with improved emergency department care through faster accessing of patient information from outside organizations.

Authors:  Jordan Everson; Keith E Kocher; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Searching for consensus among physicians involved in the management of sick-listed workers in the Belgian health care sector: a qualitative study among practitioners and stakeholders.

Authors:  Marc Vanmeerbeek; Patrick Govers; Nathalie Schippers; Stéphane Rieppi; Katrien Mortelmans; Philippe Mairiaux
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.