Literature DB >> 3204542

Practice receptionists: poorly trained and taken for granted?

J P Copeman, T D Van Zwanenberg.   

Abstract

Seventy receptionists from 20 general practices in Newcastle upon Tyne were interviewed using a questionnaire to determine their demographic and social characteristics, tasks performed and training experience. The majority of receptionists were mature married women working part-time; only 13% had received any formal training. Most receptionists had no career structure and only 9% had ever been given a written job description. Thirty-one per cent of receptionists did not feel appreciated by their general practitioners and more (49%) felt unappreciated by the general public. However, they believed their main function was to help patients. From the description of their work receptionists are clearly integral and essential members of the primary health care team.To achieve the development of primary care services it is likely that practices will need to employ more ancillary staff, and these staff will require more pre-service and in-service training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3204542      PMCID: PMC1711383     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  7 in total

1.  Computerised repeat prescriptions: simple system.

Authors:  M Aylett
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-04-13

2.  The future of general practice in Newcastle upon Tyne.

Authors:  A M Brown; S J Jachuck; F Walters; T D van Zwanenberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Changes in general practice: do patients benefit?

Authors:  S Arber; L Sawyer
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-11-21

4.  Assessment of receptionists by questions on patient management.

Authors:  D J Bain; D Durno
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-17

5.  Evaluation of a training scheme for receptionists in general practice.

Authors:  R Silverstone; L Southgate; M R Salkind
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1983-08

6.  The role of the receptionist in general practice: a 'dragon behind the desk'?

Authors:  S Arber; L Sawyer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  General practitioners and their staff.

Authors:  W O Williams; R Dajda
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-03
  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Receptionists, appointment systems and continuity of care.

Authors:  G K Freeman
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-04

2.  Modifying the behaviour of doctors and their receptionists in recurrent stressful situations.

Authors:  J F Middleton
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-02

3.  An assessment of the value of video recordings of receptionists.

Authors:  A J Sharp; P Platts; J H Turner; M H Drucquer
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-10

4.  What do general practice receptionists think and feel about their work?

Authors:  M Eisner; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Front desk talk: discourse analysis of receptionist-patient interaction.

Authors:  Heather Hewitt; Lucy McCloughan; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Managing violence in primary care: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Nat M Wright; Cath A Dixon; Charlotte N Tompkins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Receptionist rECognition and rEferral of Patients with Stroke (RECEPTS): unannounced simulated patient telephone call study in primary care.

Authors:  Ruth M Mellor; James P Sheppard; Elizabeth Bates; George Bouliotis; Janet Jones; Satinder Singh; John Skelton; Connie Wiskin; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice.

Authors:  Paul Bowie; Lyn Halley; John McKay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Protocol for using mixed methods and process improvement methodologies to explore primary care receptionist work.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Nicola Gale; Michael Burrows; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Receptionist rECognition and rEferral of PaTients with Stroke (RECEPTS) study - protocol of a mixed methods study.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Satinder Singh; Janet Jones; Elizabeth Bates; John Skelton; Connie Wiskin; Richard J McManus; Ruth M Mellor
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.