Literature DB >> 27878689

For-profit status and industry evolution in health care markets: evidence from the dialysis industry.

Nathan E Wilson1.   

Abstract

This paper examines why for-profit dialysis providers have displaced non-profit providers over the last 25 years. Using detailed data on individual markets' evolutions, I find that for-profit facilities were quicker to enter growing markets and slower to exit declining ones than non-profit facilities. Moreover, for-profit providers' presence in a market had a larger impact on the exit and entry behavior of competitors. These results suggest that for-profit dialysis providers have an advantage in static competition relative to non-profit providers, and that this-rather than lower entry costs-explains their increasing prominence. Additional empirical analyses indicate that for-profits' advantage cannot solely be attributed to efficiencies related to membership in a large, multi-facility chain. This further suggests that managerial incentives have had an economically significant impact on long-run market structure in this industry.

Keywords:  Dialysis; For-profit status; Market dynamics; Organizational structure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878689     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-016-9192-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag        ISSN: 2199-9031


  17 in total

1.  Hospital ownership and cost and quality of care: is there a dime's worth of difference?

Authors:  F A Sloan; G A Picone; D H Taylor; S Y Chou
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The effects of hospital ownership on medical productivity.

Authors:  Daniel P Kessler; Mark B McClellan
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  2002

3.  A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs.

Authors:  Hacer Ozgen; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  How vertical integration affects the quantity and cost of care for Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Thomas G Koch; Brett W Wendling; Nathan E Wilson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Moral hazard and supplier-induced demand: empirical evidence in general practice.

Authors:  Christel E van Dijk; Bernard van den Berg; Robert A Verheij; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Peter P Groenewegen; Dinny H de Bakker
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The production of dialysis by for-profit versus not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities.

Authors:  R I Griffiths; N R Powe; D J Gaskin; G F Anderson; G V de Lissovoy; P K Whelton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The effect of dialysis chains on mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Dennis J Cotter; Mae Thamer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Reexploring differences among for-profit and nonprofit dialysis providers.

Authors:  Donald K K Lee; Glenn M Chertow; Stefanos A Zenios
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Practice patterns, case mix, Medicare payment policy, and dialysis facility costs.

Authors:  R A Hirth; P J Held; S M Orzol; A Dor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Dialysis facility ownership and epoetin dosing in patients receiving hemodialysis.

Authors:  Mae Thamer; Yi Zhang; James Kaufman; Dennis Cotter; Fan Dong; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Informed decision-making in delivery of dialysis: combining clinical outcomes with sustainability.

Authors:  Christian Apel; Carsten Hornig; Frank W Maddux; Terry Ketchersid; Julianna Yeung; Adrian Guinsburg
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.