Literature DB >> 15717810

Longitudinal analysis of efficiency in multiple output dialysis markets.

Hacer Ozgen1, Yasar A Ozcan.   

Abstract

Provider efficiency in the dialysis industry in the U.S.A. has been of great interest for a variety of parties mainly because of the continuing growth in the number of such patients and providers and in the industry's costs. This study examined technical efficiency longitudinally among the multiple-output producers of freestanding facilities, as the dominant group of providers, using the DEA-based Malmquist index. Nationally representative data were obtained from Independent Renal Facility Cost Report Data Files for the years 1994 through 2000. The resulting sample comprised 140 facilities that had operated throughout the seven study years and jointly produced all dialysis outputs with nonzero inputs. The results show that over the period 1994-2000, on average multi-output, freestanding dialysis facilities did not achieve improvement in productivity. Decomposition of the Malmquist productivity indices showed improvement in technical efficiency but at the same time regress in technologies with potential to improve their quality of care. Negative change in technology was the major source of negative movement in productivity. The study concludes that under the fixed-price payment policy, multiple dialysis outputs are produced efficiently, but it may be that the quality of care is being sacrificed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15717810     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-004-7534-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  18 in total

1.  A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs.

Authors:  Hacer Ozgen; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Measuring hospital performance. A non-parametric approach.

Authors:  S Grosskopf; V Valdmanis
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Effect of the ownership of dialysis facilities on patients' survival and referral for transplantation.

Authors:  P P Garg; K D Frick; M Diener-West; N R Powe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The organization of medical care. Lessons from the Medicare end stage renal disease program.

Authors:  N G Levinsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The social contract and the treatment of permanent kidney failure.

Authors:  R A Rettig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The production of dialysis by for-profit versus not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities.

Authors:  R I Griffiths; N R Powe; D J Gaskin; G F Anderson; G V de Lissovoy; P K Whelton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Practice patterns, case mix, Medicare payment policy, and dialysis facility costs.

Authors:  R A Hirth; P J Held; S M Orzol; A Dor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  The costs of dialysis in the USA.

Authors:  S Garella
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Medicare's end-stage renal disease program: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  A R Nissenson; R A Rettig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  The success of medicare's end-stage renal-disease program: the case for profits and the private marketplace.

Authors:  E G Lowrie; C L Hampers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-08-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  Separating managerial inefficiency from influences of the operating environment: an application in dialysis.

Authors:  Nick Kontodimopoulos; Nikolaos D Papathanasiou; Yannis Tountas; Dimitris Niakas
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Measuring health indicators and allocating health resources: a DEA-based approach.

Authors:  Chih-Ching Yang
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2016-02-03

3.  The economics of cancer care: longitudinal changes in provider efficiency.

Authors:  James R Langabeer; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2009-06

4.  Efficiency of U.S. dialysis centers: an updated examination of facility characteristics that influence production of dialysis treatments.

Authors:  Sanatan Shreay; Martin Ma; Jill McCluskey; Ron C Mittelhammer; Matthew Gitlin; J Mark Stephens
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality.

Authors:  Preethy Nayar; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Technical efficiency of Critical Access Hospitals: an application of the two-stage approach with double bootstrap.

Authors:  Iustin Cristian Nedelea; James Matthew Fannin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-08-12

7.  The impact of non-discretionary factors on DEA and SFA technical efficiency differences.

Authors:  Nick Kontodimopoulos; Nikolaos D Papathanasiou; Angeliki Flokou; Yannis Tountas; Dimitris Niakas
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Assessing the efficiency of mother-to-child HIV prevention in low- and middle-income countries using data envelopment analysis.

Authors:  Sérgio P Santos; Carla A E Amado; Mauro F Santos
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-02-22

9.  Are public hospitals reforming efficiently in West Bank?

Authors:  Wasim I M Sultan; José Crispim
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.723

10.  A 12-year analysis of Malmquist total factor productivity in dialysis facilities.

Authors:  Nick Kontodimopoulos; Dimitris Niakas
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.920

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.