Literature DB >> 10230354

Maximum diameter of prostatic carcinoma is a simple, inexpensive, and independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen failure in radical prostatectomy specimens. Validation in a cohort of 434 patients.

A A Renshaw1, J P Richie, K R Loughlin, M Jiroutek, A Chung, A V D'Amico.   

Abstract

The amount of tumor in radical prostatectomy specimens can be determined with several techniques. Maximum tumor diameter correlates well with total tumor volume and can readily be obtained in incompletely submitted specimens. Initial results in a small series suggested that this measure also may predict for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. We studied whether maximum tumor diameter was an independent predictor of PSA failure in a series of 434 men who underwent radical prostatectomy because of prostatic adenocarcinoma; 118 (27.2%) had PSA failure. Preoperative PSA, Gleason score, pathologic stage, margin status, and largest tumor diameter were determined, and multivariate logistic modeling was performed on the outcome of PSA failure. Maximum tumor diameter was an independent risk factor for PSA failure, along with preoperative serum PSA level, and Gleason score > or = 8. Only 15% of men with tumor with maximum diameter < 1 cm had PSA failure, compared with 73% of men with tumor with maximum diameter > 2. Maximum tumor diameter of prostatic carcinoma is a simple, inexpensive, and independent predictor of PSA failure that can be obtained readily from partially submitted radical prostatectomy specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10230354     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/111.5.641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  11 in total

1.  Percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multi-institutional data analysis.

Authors:  Cheryn Song; Seongil Seo; Hanjong Ahn; Seok-Soo Byun; Jin Seon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Eunsik Lee; Hyun Moo Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Maximum tumor diameter adjusted to the risk profile predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Georg Müller; Malte Rieken; Gernot Bonkat; Joel Roman Gsponer; Tatjana Vlajnic; Christian Wetterauer; Thomas C Gasser; Stephen F Wyler; Alexander Bachmann; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Yujiro Ito; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Prostate cancer with bladder neck involvement: pathologic findings with application of a new practical method for tumor extent evaluation and recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Adil B Samara; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Tumor extent in radical prostatectomy specimens: is it an independent prognostic factor for biochemical (PSA) progression following surgery?

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Luciana Meirelles; Leandro L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Ubirajara Ferreira; Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Pathologic basis of focal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Janice M Mayes; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate with high spatiotemporal resolution using compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and continuous golden-angle radial sampling: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Christian Geppert; Robert Grimm; Tobias K Block; Christian Glielmi; Li Feng; Ricardo Otazo; Justin M Ream; Melanie Moccaldi Romolo; Samir S Taneja; Daniel K Sodickson; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Comparison of prostate cancer volume measured by HistoScanning™ and final histopathological results.

Authors:  J Schiffmann; J Fischer; P Tennstedt; B Beyer; K Böhm; U Michl; M Graefen; G Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Tumor detection of 18F-PSMA-1007 in the prostate gland in patients with prostate cancer using prostatectomy specimens as reference method.

Authors:  Elin Tragardh; Athanasios Simoulis; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Jogi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 11.082

10.  Maximum tumor diameter is not an independent prognostic factor in high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  I M van Oort; J A Witjes; D E G Kok; L A L M Kiemeney; C A Hulsbergen-vandeKaa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.