Literature DB >> 20697812

Tumor extent in radical prostatectomy specimens: is it an independent prognostic factor for biochemical (PSA) progression following surgery?

Athanase Billis1, Luciana Meirelles, Leandro L Freitas, Luis A Magna, Ubirajara Ferreira, Leonardo O Reis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The tumor volume or extent measurement in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens is time-consuming and technically difficult. We aimed at studying the independent prognostic value of tumor extent for biochemical progression-free following RP once it is controversial.
METHODS: This retrospective study was based on 305 consecutive patients submitted to RP. In whole-mount and totally embedded surgical specimens, tumor extent was evaluated with a point-count semi-quantitative method and correlated to several clinical and pathological variables. Biochemical progression was defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml; time to progression-free outcome was studied using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit analysis and univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox stepwise logistic regression.
RESULTS: More extensive tumors showed significantly higher preoperative PSA (P < 0.01), higher clinical stage (P = 0.03), higher positive surgical margins (P < 0.01), higher pathological stage (P < 0.01), and higher Gleason score on needle biopsies (P < 0.01) and on surgical specimens (P < 0.01). On univariate analysis, biochemical progression correlated with tumor extension (P < 0.01), preoperative PSA (P < 0.01), Gleason score on needle biopsies (P = 0.02) and on surgical specimens (P < 0.01), positive surgical margins (P = 0.01), and pathological stage (P = 0.01). There was no difference related to time of biochemical recurrence comparing less extensive with more extensive tumors (P = 0.20). In multivariate analysis, tumor extent was not predictive of biochemical progression combined to any one of the variables studied (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor extent did not provide in our study additional predictive information for biochemical progression following RP beyond preoperative PSA, Gleason score, positive surgical margins, and pathological stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20697812     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9818-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  22 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating radical prostatectomy specimens: therapeutic and prognostic importance.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.

Authors:  D F Gleason; G T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Should pathologists routinely report prostate tumour volume? The prognostic value of tumour volume in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tineke Wolters; Monique J Roobol; Pim J van Leeuwen; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Robert F Hoedemaeker; Geert J L H van Leenders; Fritz H Schröder; Theodorus H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Intraglandular tumor extent and prognosis in prostatic carcinoma: application of a grid method to prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  P A Humphrey; R T Vollmer
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Percentage carcinoma as a measure of prostatic tumor size in radical prostatectomy tissues.

Authors:  P A Humphrey; R T Vollmer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: definition and relation of tumor volume, grade and margins of resection to prognosis.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M Carmichael; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pathological factors that influence prognosis in stage A prostatic cancer: the influence of extent versus grade.

Authors:  B B Cantrell; D P DeKlerk; J C Eggleston; J K Boitnott; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Percent tumor involvement and risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Edward N Rampersaud; Leon Sun; Judd W Moul; John Madden; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prognostic significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of pathological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Jacques Irani; Alexandre De La Taille; Fabien Saint; Dimitri Vordos; Antony Cicco; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Claude Clément Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M Carmichael; A W Partin; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.