Literature DB >> 31107718

In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence.

Yujiro Ito1, Emily A Vertosick2, Daniel D Sjoberg2, Andrew J Vickers2, Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie3, Ying-Bei Chen3, Anuradha Gopalan3, Sahussapont J Sirintrapun3, Satish K Tickoo3, James A Eastham1, Peter T Scardino1, Victor E Reuter3, Samson W Fine3.   

Abstract

In the eighth edition AJCC staging, all organ-confined disease is assigned pathologic stage T2, without subclassification. We investigated whether total tumor volume (TTV) and/or maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of the index lesion are useful in improving prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in pT2 patients. We identified 1657 patients with digital tumor maps and quantification of TTV/MTD who had pT2 disease on radical prostatectomy (RP). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess whether TTV and/or MTD are independent predictors of BCR when adjusting for a base model incorporating age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, RP grade group, and surgical margin status. If either tumor quantification added significantly, we calculated and reported the c-index. Ninety-five patients experienced BCR after RP; median follow-up for patients without BCR was 5.7 years. The c-index was 0.737 for the base model. Although there was some evidence of an association between TTV and BCR (P=0.088), this did not meet conventional levels of statistical significance and only provided a limited increase in discrimination (0.743; c-index improvement: 0.006). MTD was not associated with BCR (P>0.9). In analyses excluding patients with grade group 1 on biopsy who would be less likely to undergo RP in contemporary practice (622 patients; 59 with BCR), TTV/MTD was not a statistically significant predictor (P=0.4 and 0.8, respectively). Without evidence that tumor quantitation, in the form of either TTV or MTD of the index lesion, is useful for the prediction of BCR in pT2 prostate cancer, we cannot recommend its routine reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31107718      PMCID: PMC6629508          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  38 in total

1.  Prostate cancer is highly predictable: a prognostic equation based on all morphological variables in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  T A Stamey; C M Yemoto; J E McNeal; B M Sigal; I M Johnstone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  T A Stamey; J E McNeal; C M Yemoto; B M Sigal; I M Johnstone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Maximum diameter of prostatic carcinoma is a simple, inexpensive, and independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen failure in radical prostatectomy specimens. Validation in a cohort of 434 patients.

Authors:  A A Renshaw; J P Richie; K R Loughlin; M Jiroutek; A Chung; A V D'Amico
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Visual estimate of the percentage of carcinoma is an independent predictor of prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  G F Carvalhal; P A Humphrey; P Thorson; Y Yan; C G Ramos; W J Catalona
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Richard Whittington; S Bruce Malkowicz; Kerri Cote; Marian Loffredo; Delray Schultz; Ming-Hui Chen; John E Tomaszewski; Andrew A Renshaw; Alan Wein; Jerome P Richie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic factors for multifocal prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of significance of secondary cancers.

Authors:  Masanori Noguchi; Thomas A Stamey; John E McNeal; Rosalie Nolley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume.

Authors:  Michael E Chen; Dennis Johnston; Adriana O Reyes; Cindy P Soto; R Joseph Babaian; Patricia Troncoso
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  The long-term clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more years after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  John F Ward; Michael L Blute; Jeffrey Slezak; Erik J Bergstralh; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prognostic significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of pathological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Jacques Irani; Alexandre De La Taille; Fabien Saint; Dimitri Vordos; Antony Cicco; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Claude Clément Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can Tumour Volume Percentage in Radical Prostatectomy Predict Cancer Biochemical Recurrence? Determining a Cut-off Point and Composite Risk Factors Approach.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Mohamed Ismail; Christopher Eden
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-06-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.