Literature DB >> 25129371

Maximum tumor diameter adjusted to the risk profile predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Georg Müller1, Malte Rieken, Gernot Bonkat, Joel Roman Gsponer, Tatjana Vlajnic, Christian Wetterauer, Thomas C Gasser, Stephen F Wyler, Alexander Bachmann, Lukas Bubendorf.   

Abstract

Currently, no consensus exists on the best method for tumor quantification in prostate cancer (PCA), and its prognostic value remains controversial. We evaluated how a newly defined maximum tumor diameter (MTD) might contribute to the prediction of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in a consecutive series of PCA patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients with PCA who underwent RP without neoadjuvant therapy at a single center were included for analysis. MTD was defined as the largest diameter of all identified tumors in all three dimensions (i.e., length, width, or depth) of the prostate ("Basel technique"). Cox regression models addressed the association of MTD with BCR in three risk groups (low risk-prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, pT2, and Gleason score (GS) ≤ 6; intermediate risk-PSA ≥ 10 and <20 ng/ml and/or pT2 and GS = 7; high risk-PSA > 20 ng/ml or pT3 or GS ≥ 8) and whole cohort. Within a median follow-up of 44 months (interquartile range (IQR) 23-66), 48 patients (9.4 %) in the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups experienced BCR. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, PSA, pathological stage (pT stage), GS, positive surgical margins (PSMs), and MTD > 19.5 mm were independent predictors for BCR (p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis, MTD as a nominal variable (<24.5 and >24.5 mm) was the only independent predictor of BCR in the intermediate-risk group (hazard ratio (HR) 9.933, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.070-47.665; p < 0.05). MTD is an independent risk factor of BCR in PC patients after RP. The combination of the MTD with other well-known prognostic factors after RP may improve decision-making concerning follow-up intensity or adjuvant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25129371     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1643-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  29 in total

Review 1.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.

Authors:  Hemamali Samaratunga; Rodolfo Montironi; Lawrence True; Jonathan I Epstein; David F Griffiths; Peter A Humphrey; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas M Wheeler; John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Maximum tumor diameter is a simple and valuable index associated with the local extent of disease in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ryuichi Mizuno; Jun Nakashima; Makio Mukai; Hajime Ookita; Ken Nakagawa; Mototsugu Oya; Takashi Ohigashi; Ken Marumo; Masaru Murai
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multi-institutional data analysis.

Authors:  Cheryn Song; Seongil Seo; Hanjong Ahn; Seok-Soo Byun; Jin Seon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Eunsik Lee; Hyun Moo Lee; Sang Eun Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Liang Cheng; Michael O Koch; Beth E Juliar; Joanne K Daggy; Richard S Foster; Richard Bihrle; Thomas A Gardner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Richard Whittington; S Bruce Malkowicz; Kerri Cote; Marian Loffredo; Delray Schultz; Ming-Hui Chen; John E Tomaszewski; Andrew A Renshaw; Alan Wein; Jerome P Richie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The greatest dimension of prostate carcinoma is a simple, inexpensive predictor of prostate specific antigen failure in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  A A Renshaw; J P Richie; K R Loughlin; M Jiroutek; A Chung; A V D'Amico
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Alphaeus M Wise; Thomas A Stamey; John E McNeal; John L Clayton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Assessment of clinical and pathologic characteristics predisposing to disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Jüri Palisaar; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter G Hammerer; Edith Huland; Alexander Haese; Salvator Fernandez; Andreas Erbersdobler; Rolf-Peter Henke; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Prognostic significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of pathological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Jacques Irani; Alexandre De La Taille; Fabien Saint; Dimitri Vordos; Antony Cicco; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Claude Clément Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M Carmichael; A W Partin; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can Tumour Volume Percentage in Radical Prostatectomy Predict Cancer Biochemical Recurrence? Determining a Cut-off Point and Composite Risk Factors Approach.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Mohamed Ismail; Christopher Eden
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-06-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.