Literature DB >> 10227940

The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the laparoscopic era.

N Geron1, R Reshef, M Shiller, D Kniaz, A Eitan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones remains unsettled. Options include pre- and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or laparoscopic exploration of the CBD. This retrospective study evaluates the role of ERCP in the management of suspected CBD stones, with an emphasis on indications, endoscopic findings, and outcome.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the consecutive medical records of 99 patients (67 females and 32 males) who underwent ERCP for suspected CBD stones between March 1992 and December 1995.
RESULTS: In 86 patients, ERCP was performed preoperatively. Indications for ERCP included jaundice, pancreatitis, elevated liver functions tests (LFT), and ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) scan findings. Forty one (48%) of 86 preoperative ERCP had positive findings; 37 (43%) were negative, and in 8 (9%) we failed to demonstrate the CBD. There were seven (8%) major complications: four cases of acute pancreatitis, one case of acute bleeding, and two cases of acute bleeding with perforation. There was no mortality. When pancreatitis was the only indication for ERCP, 0 of 8 patients had positive findings in comparison with 50% when pancreatitis was associated with jaundice and LFT, and 93% when US or CT scan demonstrated stones or dilation of the CBD.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ERCP is a valuable option for management of CBD stones but should be performed selectively. Neither pancreatitis alone nor LFT alone is an indication for ERCP. The presence of CBD stones is more likely when multiple indications are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10227940     DOI: 10.1007/pl00022936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  ESWL for difficult bile duct stones: a 15-year single centre experience.

Authors:  Rosangela Muratori; Francesco Azzaroli; Federica Buonfiglioli; Flavio Alessandrelli; Paolo Cecinato; Giuseppe Mazzella; Enrico Roda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Timing of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with sphincterotomy: a prospective observational study of 308 patients.

Authors:  Erdal Birol Bostanci; Metin Ercan; Ilter Ozer; Zafer Teke; Erkan Parlak; Musa Akoglu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Using cholecystokinin to facilitate endoscopic clearance of large common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Qi-Jie Zhang; Ming Zhang; Xiao Zhu; Shu-Xia Sun; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher Molvar; Bryan Glaenzer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones: results of a retrospective, single center study between 1996-2002.

Authors:  Laszlo Lakatos; Gabor Mester; Gyorgy Reti; Attila Nagy; Peter Laszlo Lakatos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 8.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 9.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

10.  Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis.

Authors:  A Bove; G Bongarzoni; G Palone; R M Di Renzo; E M Calisesi; L Corradetti; M Di Nicola; L Corbellini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.