Literature DB >> 10224559

Advantages of day 4 embryo transfer in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.

L Gianaroli1, M C Magli, S Munné, D Fortini, A P Ferraretti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Following preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy, embryo transfer was executed on day 4, with the aim of providing more time for expanding from six to nine the number of diagnosed chromosomes per single cell (Group 2; 45 cycles). The results obtained were compared to those derived from conventional day 3 transfer (Group 1; 71 cycles).
METHODS: For multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, two panels of probes were used: the first, specific for chromosomes XY, 13, 16, 18, and 21, was tested in all patients (Groups 1 and 2); the second was implemented only in Group 2 patients for the detection of chromosomes 14, 15, and 22.
RESULTS: A total of 406 embryos underwent fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in Group 1, and 236 in Group 2. Comparable percentages of both chromosomal abnormalities (61% and 62%) and pregnancy and implantation rates (36% and 24.5% in Group 1, 41% and 23.6% in Group 2) resulted, regardless of the higher mean age in Group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of the nine chromosomes which are most frequently associated with aneuploidy in humans could have an immediate impact on the rate of spontaneous abortions. Additional advantages are represented by the more accurate morphological evaluation of euploid embryos; the advanced compaction, which means that embryos are less exposed to damage during the transfer procedure; and the possibility of performing a reanalysis in cases where a fluorescence in situ hybridization diagnosis is not obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10224559      PMCID: PMC3455762          DOI: 10.1023/a:1020356605408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  15 in total

1.  Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21.

Authors:  S Munné; C Márquez; C Magli; P Morton; L Morrison
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Simultaneous enumeration of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y in interphase cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.

Authors:  S Munné; H U Weier
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1996

3.  Will preimplantation genetic diagnosis assist patients with a poor prognosis to achieve pregnancy?

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; S Munné; A Fiorentino; N Montanaro; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Delaying transfer to the third day post-insemination, to select non-arrested embryos, increases development to the fetal heart stage.

Authors:  K J Dawson; J Conaghan; G R Ostera; R M Winston; K Hardy
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryonic growth in vitro.

Authors:  M Plachot; J Mandelbaum
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Detection of aneuploidy and chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos during preimplantation sex determination by fluorescent in situ hybridisation, (FISH).

Authors:  J D Delhanty; D K Griffin; A H Handyside; J Harper; G H Atkinson; M H Pieters; R M Winston
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  S Munné; A Lee; Z Rosenwaks; J Grifo; J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  S Munné; M Alikani; G Tomkin; J Grifo; J Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Relationship of timing of agonist administration in the cycle phase to the ovarian response to gonadotropins in the long down-regulation protocols for assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  A P Ferraretti; C Magli; E Feliciani; N Montanaro; L Gianaroli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Polar body diagnosis of common aneuploidies by FISH.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky; J Cieslak; M Freidine; V Ivakhnenko; G Wolf; L Kovalinskaya; M White; A Lifchez; B Kaplan; J Moise; J Valle; N Ginsberg; C Strom; A Kuliev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  5 in total

1.  Preimplantation diagnosis: an alternative to prenatal diagnosis of genetic and chromosomal disorders. International Working Group on Preimplantation Genetics.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Direct comparison of detection systems used for the development of single-cell genetic tests in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  D L Blake; N L Dean; C Knight; S L Tan; A Ao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Preimplantation diagnosis after assisted reproduction techniques for genetically-determined male infertility.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; A P Ferraretti; E Iammarrone
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET.

Authors:  Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; Hak Jun Jeong; San Hyun Yoon; Min Whan Koh; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Pregnancy rates of day 4 and day 5 embryos after culture in an integrated time-lapse incubator.

Authors:  Verena Holschbach; Julia Weigert; Jens Erik Dietrich; Sabine Roesner; Markus Montag; Thomas Strowitzki; Bettina Toth
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.