Literature DB >> 8150922

Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos.

S Munné1, A Lee, Z Rosenwaks, J Grifo, J Cohen.   

Abstract

A short fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) procedure using fluorochrome and digoxigenin labelled DNA probes was developed for application in human preimplantation embryos in order to analyse the five chromosomes most involved in human aneuploidy (X, Y, 18, 13 and 21). The chromosomes were fluorescent-stained and detected simultaneously in 157 blastomeres from 30 human embryos. Successful FISH analysis was achieved in 93% of the blastomeres. Aberrations for these chromosomes were found in 70% of abnormally developing monospermic embryos. The majority of normally developing monospermic embryos obtained from older patients were also chromosomally abnormal. By analysing all or most of the cells from these embryos, true mosaicism was distinguished from technique failure. Mosaic embryos, polyploid embryos with ploidies as high as 8n, haploid embryos, embryos monosomic for 13/21 and for X, and embryos trisomic for 13/21 and 18, were common in abnormally developing embryos. In contrast, aneuploidy was the main chromosome abnormality found in normally developing monospermic embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8150922     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  81 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes?

Authors:  M Bahçe; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 13-, 16-, 18-, 21-, 22-, X-, and Y-chromosome probes.

Authors:  Y Sasabe; K P Katayama; T Nishimura; A Takahashi; H Asakura; K Winchester-Peden; L Wise; Y Abe; H Kubo; S Hirakawa
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Human embryos derived from in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes: analysis for chromosomal abnormalities and nuclear morphology.

Authors:  C DeScisciolo; D L Wright; J F Mayer; W Gibbons; S J Muasher; S E Lanzendorf
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Is there any evidence for immunologically mediated or immunologically modifiable early pregnancy failure?

Authors:  David A Clark
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Patient-specific probes for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural and numerical aberrations in interphase cells.

Authors:  H U Weier; S Munné; J Fung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Advantages of day 4 embryo transfer in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; S Munné; D Fortini; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis--how to control PGD.

Authors:  Naoki Takeshita; Harumi Kubo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Preimplantation diagnosis (PGD)--a European clinician's point of view.

Authors:  Wilfried Feichtinger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  The cytogenetics of preimplantation human development: insights provided by traditional and novel techniques.

Authors:  Helen G Tempest; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.