Literature DB >> 9308808

Will preimplantation genetic diagnosis assist patients with a poor prognosis to achieve pregnancy?

L Gianaroli1, M C Magli, S Munné, A Fiorentino, N Montanaro, A P Ferraretti.   

Abstract

PGD (preimplantation genetic diagnosis) of aneuploidy for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 was carried out on 196 embryos from 36 infertile patients classified with a poor prognosis due to (i) maternal age, (ii) repeated in-vitro fertilization (IVF) failures and (iii) mosaic karyotype. The percentage of abnormal embryos was comparable in the three groups of patients: maternal age 63%, repeated IVF failure 57%, and mosaic karyotype 62%. The analysis of the overall data revealed an increased incidence of abnormal embryos in the older age categories (predominantly due to aneuploidy), even in embryos at the 7- to 8-cell stage. In addition, the percentage of chromosomally abnormal embryos was directly proportional to the number of IVF failures, where the increase in chromosomal abnormalities was not correlated to aneuploidy but to other aberrations such as mosaicism and polyploidy. Following PGD, 28 patients had at least one embryo transferred that appeared normal by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). Four clinical pregnancies resulted, with an implantation rate of 10% per normal embryo. In conclusion, the high rate of chromosomally abnormal embryos in poor prognosis patients may have been the cause of implantation failure in their previous IVF cycles. Therefore, the possibility of transferring embryos with a normal FISH complement could improve the chance of pregnancy in this category of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9308808     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  Advantages of day 4 embryo transfer in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; S Munné; D Fortini; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation diagnosis after assisted reproduction techniques for genetically-determined male infertility.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; A P Ferraretti; E Iammarrone
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective.

Authors:  C B Coulam; R S Jeyendran; M Fiddler; E Pergament
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ivan Solà; Ana Robles; Ramón Carreras; Juan Balasch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor-prognosis patients.

Authors:  M C Magli; L Gianaroli; S Munné; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Should the flexibility enabled by performing a day-4 embryo transfer remain as a valid option in the IVF laboratory? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Tsioulou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Giannelou; S Grigoriadis; A Pantou; K Nikolettos; N Vlahos; K Pantos; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  A cytogenetic study of couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions and infertile patients with recurrent IVF/ICSI failure.

Authors:  Hossein Mozdarani; Anahita Mohseni Meybodi; Shabnam Zari-Moradi
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-01

Review 10.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.