Literature DB >> 9783846

Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21.

S Munné1, C Márquez, C Magli, P Morton, L Morrison.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for application in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of aneuploidy has been used successfully, but stringent scoring criteria to score FISH signals have not been developed. In the present study a FISH protocol to simultaneously enumerate chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18, and 21 was used to evaluate two different scoring criteria. The criteria consider hybridization signal size, shape, and vicinity to other signals and nuclear diameter. For this purpose, 74 embryos (412 blastomeres) donated for research had most or all of their cells analysed. The least error-prone criterion (9%) was selected for use in PGD cases. Some probes produced more errors than others, and these criteria may provide clues to improve these probes. The same probe solution was applied to 55 PGD cases and a total of 307 embryos. Of the non-transferred embryos, 67 were fully reanalysed and 1.5% (1/67) of them were falsely diagnosed as normal, while 19% (13/67) were falsely diagnosed as abnormal. Twelve of the patients became pregnant after PGD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9783846     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/4.9.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  15 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes?

Authors:  M Bahçe; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Advantages of day 4 embryo transfer in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; S Munné; D Fortini; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Monozygotic twins with discordant karyotypes following preimplantation genetic screening and single embryo transfer: case report.

Authors:  Gabriela Tauwinklova; Renata Gaillyova; Pavel Travnik; Eva Oracova; Katerina Vesela; Lenka Hromadova; Jan Vesely; Petra Musilova; Jiri Rubes; Jitka Kadlecova; Iva Slamova; Eva Makaturova; Vladimira Vranova
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preimplantation genetic haplotyping a new application for diagnosis of translocation carrier's embryos- preliminary observations of two robertsonian translocation carrier families.

Authors:  Jana Shamash; Shlomit Rienstein; Haike Wolf-Reznik; Elon Pras; Michal Dekel; Talia Litmanovitch; Masha Brengauz; Boleslav Goldman; Hagith Yonath; Jehoshua Dor; Jacob Levron; Ayala Aviram-Goldring
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective.

Authors:  C B Coulam; R S Jeyendran; M Fiddler; E Pergament
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosome rearrangements - one blastomere biopsy versus two blastomere biopsy.

Authors:  D Brodie; C E Beyer; E Osborne; V Kralevski; S Rasi; T Osianlis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Complex chromosomal rearrangement-a lesson learned from PGS.

Authors:  Tsvia Frumkin; Sagit Peleg; Veronica Gold; Adi Reches; Shiri Asaf; Foad Azem; Dalit Ben-Yosef; Mira Malcov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Chromosomal integrity of human preimplantation embryos at different days post fertilization.

Authors:  Michal Dekel-Naftali; Ayala Aviram-Goldring; Talia Litmanovitch; Jana Shamash; Hagith Yonath; Ariel Hourvitz; Yuval Yung; Masha Brengauz; Eyal Schiff; Shlomit Rienstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Higher degree of chromosome mosaicism in preimplantation embryos from carriers of robertsonian translocation t(13;14) in comparison with embryos from karyotypically normal IVF patients.

Authors:  Serena Emiliani; Eric Gonzalez-Merino; Marc Van den Bergh; Marc Abramowicz; Yvon Englert
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Claire E Beyer; E Willats
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.