Literature DB >> 10207644

Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing.

K R Smith1, J A West, R T Croyle, J R Botkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether psychological distress differs among individuals tested for a BRCA1 mutation and is moderated by the pattern of their siblings' test results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in this study are members of a large kindred identified with a BRCA1 mutation. Subjects included 87 males and 125 females who completed a baseline interview, were tested for a BRCA1 gene mutation, received their results in person from a genetic counselor, completed a follow-up interview 1-2 weeks after the receipt of their test results, and had complete data on all variables used in the analysis. The main outcome of the study was psychological distress as measured by the Impact of Event Scale during the 1-2 week follow-up interview. Data were analyzed based on multiple regression.
RESULTS: Male carriers, relative to noncarriers, experienced significantly more distress if they were the first tested than when all of their tested siblings were already known to be negative. Noncarrier males whose siblings all tested positive also encountered significant test-related distress. The largest adverse psychological consequences for female carriers, relative to noncarriers, were for those who were tested first and those whose tested siblings were noncarriers.
CONCLUSIONS: The familial context in which genetic testing is conducted may be important for understanding how individuals react to their own test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10207644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

Review 1.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Short- and long-term impact of receiving genetic mutation results in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lim; Mariette Macluran; Melanie Price; Barbara Bennett; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations.

Authors:  Heidi A Hamann; Timothy W Smith; Ken R Smith; Robert T Croyle; John M Ruiz; John C Kircher; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  The Colored, Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM): A Conceptual Approach and Tool for Genetic Counseling Research.

Authors:  R Kenen; J Peters
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Ellen Peters; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2017-05-05

6.  The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Dana Ketcher; Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Deborah Cragun; Jongphil Kim; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Cheryl L Knott; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Susan V Montgomery; Andrea M Barsevick; Brian L Egleston; Ruth Bingler; Karen Ruth; Suzanne M Miller; John Malick; Terrence P Cescon; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  A Counselling Model for BRCA1/2 Genetic Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

9.  Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Natalia Kuhn; Lindsey Hoskins; Anne Letocha; Regina Kenen; Jennifer Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  Genetic counseling and testing for common hereditary breast cancer syndromes: a paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology.

Authors:  Dawn C Allain
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.