Literature DB >> 10207640

Intention to learn results of genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer.

S W Vernon1, E R Gritz, S K Peterson, C A Perz, S Marani, C I Amos, W F Baile.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This report investigates the correlates of intention to find out genetic test results in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic counseling and testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Specifically, we investigated whether intention to learn genetic test results was associated with sociodemographic factors, medical history, psychosocial factors, attitudes, beliefs, and decisional considerations related to genetic testing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 342 colorectal cancer patients who went through an informed consent process and gave blood for genetic testing and who were eligible for a psychosocial questionnaire study, 269 cases completed a baseline interview. Patients were contacted in person during a routine clinic visit or by letter and follow-up telephone call and were interviewed either in person or by telephone.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis, intention to learn test results was positively associated with income, quality of life, a belief that being tested will help family members prevent cancer, being worried about carrying an altered gene, and a belief that one has the ability to cope with test results. It was negatively associated with a belief that genetic counseling is too much trouble relative to the benefits. Intention also was positively associated with scales measuring the pros of learning test results and the pros of informing relatives about test results; it was negatively associated with the cons of learning test results. In multivariable analysis, the belief that testing would help family members prevent cancer, being worried about carrying an altered gene, and the pros of learning test results remained statistically associated with intention when other variables were included in the model.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the positive aspects of genetic testing were more strongly associated with intention than were the negative aspects. They also showed that persons who stated an intention to learn their genetic test results were more likely than persons who did not to affirm both the benefits and the importance of such testing. These results are consistent with the literature on psychosocial aspects of genetic testing for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10207640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  22 in total

Review 1.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The perceived advantages and disadvantages of presymptomatic testing for Machado-Joseph disease: development of a new self-response inventory.

Authors:  Luísa Rolim; José A Zagalo-Cardoso; Constança Paúl; Jorge Sequeiros; Manuela Fleming
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  C Phelps; F Wood; P Bennett; K Brain; J Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African-Americans at risk for having a hereditary cancer predisposing gene mutation.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; James E Coxworth; Sara E Simonson; Joseph B Fanning
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Hopefulness predicts resilience after hereditary colorectal cancer genetic testing: a prospective outcome trajectories study.

Authors:  Samuel M Y Ho; Judy W C Ho; George A Bonanno; Annie T W Chu; Emily M S Chan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Half; Dani Bercovich; Paul Rozen
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 10.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.