Literature DB >> 19170079

Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African-Americans at risk for having a hereditary cancer predisposing gene mutation.

Anita Y Kinney1, James E Coxworth, Sara E Simonson, Joseph B Fanning.   

Abstract

Elevated psychological distress has been observed among people at increased risk for familial cancer. Researchers consider religiosity and spirituality (RS) to be positive coping mechanisms associated with reduced psychological distress. Relatively little is known about the impact of RS on genomic health issues. The objectives of our study were: (1) describe the prevalence of RS and depressive symptoms and (2) explore how RS relates to psychological distress in a cohort of individuals with a > or =25% prior probability of a genetic predisposition to cancer. Participants (n = 99) were drawn from an African-American, Louisiana-based kindred with a mutation at the BRCA1 locus. This analysis reports findings from a survey assessing RS and the use of three types of religious coping styles: collaborative, self-directing, and deferring. Clinically significant depressive symptoms were relatively high (27%); with females (33%) more likely than males (17%) to report symptoms (P < 0.01). The majority of participants reported being highly religious. The most commonly employed religious problem solving style used by participants was collaborative (X=22.9; SD=5.8) versus self-directing (X=12.8; SD = 5.1) and deferring (X=19.9; SD = 6.3). We did not observe significant associations between RS indicators and psychological distress, nor did we observe appreciable differences related to gender or risk perception. Although RS beliefs and practices are important for many African-Americans, we did not find evidence that indicators of self-reported RS are associated with psychological distress prior to genetic counseling and testing. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19170079      PMCID: PMC3040977          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  32 in total

1.  Roles of religious involvement and social support in the risk of colon cancer among Blacks and Whites.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Lindsey E Bloor; William N Dudley; Robert C Millikan; Elizabeth Marshall; Christopher Martin; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Religious and spiritual involvement among older african americans, Caribbean blacks, and non-Hispanic whites: findings from the national survey of american life.

Authors:  Robert Joseph Taylor; Linda M Chatters; James S Jackson
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 3.  Prayer and health: review, meta-analysis, and research agenda.

Authors:  Kevin S Masters; Glen I Spielmans
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-05-03

4.  Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Sara Ellis Simonsen; Bonnie Jeanne Baty; Diptasri Mandal; Susan L Neuhausen; Kate Seggar; Rich Holubkov; Ken Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  When god disappoints: difficulty forgiving god and its role in negative emotion.

Authors:  J J Exline; A M Yali; M Lobel
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  1999-05

6.  National trends in the outpatient treatment of depression.

Authors:  Mark Olfson; Steven C Marcus; Benjamin Druss; Lynn Elinson; Terri Tanielian; Harold Alan Pincus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Religion, spirituality, and genetics: mapping the terrain for research purposes.

Authors:  Larry R Churchill
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; J C Holland; M S Halper; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  S Sivell; R Iredale; J Gray; B Coles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 10.  Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jeannie V Pasacreta
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shortened time interval between colorectal cancer diagnosis and risk testing for hereditary colorectal cancer is not related to higher psychological distress.

Authors:  K M Landsbergen; J B Prins; H G Brunner; N Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Exploring Genetic Numeracy Skills in a Sample of U.S. University Students.

Authors:  Margo W Bergman; Patricia Goodson; Heather Honoré Goltz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.