Ritesh Arvind Pandey 1 , Ashok N Johari 2 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) is a common disorder of childhood and has a good prognosis when treated at an early age. In spite of being a significant concern, many children with DDH are not picked early and present late at walking age. In our country, it is presumed to be due to absence of a national policy for screening of DDH. Screening programmes including the combination of clinical and radiological methods in different ways have been suggested. However, the exact method of screening is controversial. PURPOSE: To analyze effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various screening methods for DDH. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline database was explored for original case series and randomized clinical trials. Inclusion criteria were English language, screening for DDH in neonates, sample size more than 500, and studies with minimum duration of one year. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were selected to write the manuscript. This included 23 studies looking for effectiveness of a screening programme and 11 studies comparing various outcomes of different screening strategies. A trend favoring universal ultrasound screening was observed. CONCLUSION: The literature supports universal ultrasound screening and has proved its cost-effectiveness. However, considering the logistic and financial challenges in our country, immediate implementation of universal ultrasound screening seems impractical. In the absence of any current guidelines for screening for DDH in India, we suggest professional organizations involved in the care of children and public health policy-makers to come together to develop national screening guidelines for DDH. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.
BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) is a common disorder of childhood and has a good prognosis when treated at an early age. In spite of being a significant concern, many children with DDH are not picked early and present late at walking age. In our country, it is presumed to be due to absence of a national policy for screening of DDH. Screening programmes including the combination of clinical and radiological methods in different ways have been suggested. However, the exact method of screening is controversial. PURPOSE: To analyze effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various screening methods for DDH. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline database was explored for original case series and randomized clinical trials. Inclusion criteria were English language, screening for DDH in neonates, sample size more than 500, and studies with minimum duration of one year. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were selected to write the manuscript. This included 23 studies looking for effectiveness of a screening programme and 11 studies comparing various outcomes of different screening strategies. A trend favoring universal ultrasound screening was observed. CONCLUSION: The literature supports universal ultrasound screening and has proved its cost-effectiveness. However, considering the logistic and financial challenges in our country, immediate implementation of universal ultrasound screening seems impractical. In the absence of any current guidelines for screening for DDH in India, we suggest professional organizations involved in the care of children and public health policy-makers to come together to develop national screening guidelines for DDH. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Clinical screening; Developmental dysplasia of hip; Newborn; Selective; Ultrasonography; Universal
Year: 2021
PMID： 35003532 PMCID： PMC8688670 DOI： 10.1007/s43465-021-00409-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN： 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251