Literature DB >> 26169992

Do we need to follow up an early normal ultrasound with a later plain radiograph in children with a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip?

Suhayl Tafazal1, Mark J Flowers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We routinely perform a pelvic radiograph between 6 and 12 months of age for children with a family history of developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH). We conducted this study to determine whether children with a family history of DDH and a normal hip ultrasound after birth require any further radiological follow-up.
METHODS: We identified all children referred to our hip-screening clinic in a 3-year period between August 2008 and August 2011 with a family history of DDH and a normal hip ultrasound after birth. A total of 119 patients with a normal hip ultrasound after birth had a pelvic radiograph at a median age of 6.6 months.
RESULTS: Six patients had residual dysplasia (acetabular index >30°) on the initial radiograph; five of these had resolved spontaneously by age 12 months, and the remaining patient had a normal radiograph at 21 months of age and was discharged.
CONCLUSION: We have found no cases of residual hip dysplasia requiring treatment in children with a family history of DDH and a normal hip ultrasound after birth. We have therefore changed our practice accordingly and no longer routinely followed up such cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental dysplasia hip; Family history; Radiograph; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26169992     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1668-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  16 in total

1.  Risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasonographic findings in the neonatal period.

Authors:  Christopher E Bache; John Clegg; Mark Herron
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Ultrasound screening of hips at risk for CDH. Failure to reduce the incidence of late cases.

Authors:  N M Clarke; J Clegg; A N Al-Chalabi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-01

3.  Ultrasound screening in developmental hip dysplasia: do all scanned hips need to be followed up?

Authors:  Paul Jellicoe; Angus Aitken; Kenneth Wright
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Ultrasound and congenital dislocation of the hip. The importance of dynamic assessment.

Authors:  L B Engesaeter; D J Wilson; D Nag; M K Benson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

5.  Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults.

Authors:  D Tönnis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular dysplasia and familial joint laxity: two etiological factors in congenital dislocation of the hip. A review of 589 patients and their families.

Authors:  R Wynne-Davies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1970-11

7.  Ultrasound screening for hips at risk in developmental dysplasia. Is it worth it?

Authors:  R W Paton; M S Srinivasan; B Shah; S Hollis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

8.  The use of X-ray at 5 months in a selective screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Kathryn R Price; Rosemary Dove; James B Hunter
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  What follow-up is required for children with a family history of developmental dysplasia of the hip?

Authors:  Donald Osarumwense; David Popple; Irene F Kershaw; Christopher J Kershaw; Andrew J Furlong
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  Imaging in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  H T Harcke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  2 in total

1.  A normal screening ultrasound does not provide complete reassurance in infants at risk of hip dysplasia; further follow-up is required.

Authors:  Jill Mulrain; Jennifer Hennebry; Patrick Dicker; James Condren; Donal O'Driscoll; Joseph O'Beirne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.