Literature DB >> 10196680

Cellular signal adaptation with damage control at low doses versus the predominance of DNA damage at high doses.

L E Feinendegen1, V P Bond, C A Sondhaus, K I Altman.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation is known to potentially interfere with cellular functions at all levels of cell organization and induces DNA lesions apparently with an incidence linearly related to D, also at low doses. On the other hand, low doses have also been observed to initiate a slowly appearing temporary protection against causation and accumulation of DNA lesions, involving the radical detoxification system, DNA repair and removal of DNA damage. This protection apparently does not operate at high doses; it has been described to be nonlinear, increasing initially with D, beginning to decrease when D exceeds approximately 0.1-0.2 Gy, and eventually disappearing at higher D. The various adaptive responses have been shown to last individually from hours to weeks in different cell types and resemble responses to oxidative stress. Damage to DNA is continuously and endogenously produced mainly by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated in a normal oxidative metabolism. This endogenous DNA damage quantitatively exceeds DNA damage from low-dose irradiation, by several orders of magnitude. Thus, the protective responses following acute low-dose irradiation may be presumed to mainly counteract the endogenous DNA damage. Accordingly, the model described here uses two dose-effect functions, a linear one for causing and a nonlinear one for protecting against DNA damage from whatever cause in the irradiated cells and tissues. The resulting net dose-risk function strongly suggests that the incidence of cancer versus dose in the irradiated tissues is much less likely to be linear than to exhibit a threshold. The observed cancer incidence may even fall below the spontaneous incidence, when D to cells is below approximately 0.2 Gy. However incomplete, these data support a reexamination of the LNT hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10196680     DOI: 10.1016/s0764-4469(99)80051-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  C R Acad Sci III        ISSN: 0764-4469


  16 in total

1.  Computational modeling of signaling pathways mediating cell cycle checkpoint control and apoptotic responses to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; In Chio Lou; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  Systems biology and its potential role in radiobiology.

Authors:  Ludwig Feinendegen; Philip Hahnfeldt; Eric E Schadt; Michael Stumpf; Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

4.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

5.  Non-linear adaptive phenomena which decrease the risk of infection after pre-exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi; M Motamedifar; G Namdari; M Taheri; A R Mortazavi; N Shokrpour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Low-dose cancer risk modeling must recognize up-regulation of protection.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Manganese superoxide dismutase interacts with a large scale of cellular and mitochondrial proteins in low-dose radiation-induced adaptive radioprotection.

Authors:  Angela Eldridge; Ming Fan; Gayle Woloschak; David J Grdina; Brett A Chromy; Jian Jian Li
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  Increased Radioresistance to Lethal Doses of Gamma Rays in Mice and Rats after Exposure to Microwave Radiation Emitted by a GSM Mobile Phone Simulator.

Authors:  Smj Mortazavi; Ma Mosleh-Shirazi; Ar Tavassoli; M Taheri; Ar Mehdizadeh; Sas Namazi; A Jamali; R Ghalandari; S Bonyadi; M Haghani; M Shafie
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Induction of DNA double-strand breaks by zeocin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the role of increased DNA double-strand breaks rejoining in the formation of an adaptive response.

Authors:  S G Chankova; E Dimova; M Dimitrova; P E Bryant
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Low-dose radiation and genotoxic chemicals can protect against stochastic biological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Vernon E Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.