Literature DB >> 17639449

Induction of DNA double-strand breaks by zeocin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the role of increased DNA double-strand breaks rejoining in the formation of an adaptive response.

S G Chankova1, E Dimova, M Dimitrova, P E Bryant.   

Abstract

This study aimed to test the potential of the radiomimetic chemical zeocin to induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and "adaptive response" (AR) in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strain CW15 as a model system. The AR was measured as cell survival using a micro-colony assay, and by changes in rejoining of DSB DNA. The level of induced DSB was measured by constant field gel electrophoresis based on incorporation of cells into agarose blocks before cell lysis. This avoids the risk of accidental induction of DSB during the manipulation procedures. Our results showed that zeocin could induce DSB in C. reinhardtii strain CW15 in a linear dose-response fashion up to 100 microg ml(-1) which marked the beginning of a plateau. The level of DSB induced by 100 microg ml(-1) zeocin was similar to that induced by 250 Gy of gamma-ray irradiation. It was also found that, similar to gamma rays, zeocin could induce AR measured as DSB in C. reinhardtii CW15 and this AR involved acceleration of the rate of DSB rejoining, too. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that zeocin could induce AR in some low eukaryotes such as C. reinhardtii.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17639449     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-007-0123-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  53 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-induced adaptive responses and bystander effects.

Authors:  Hideki Matsumoto; Akihisa Takahashi; Takeo Ohnishi
Journal:  Biol Sci Space       Date:  2004-12

Review 2.  Widespread adaptive response against environmental methylating agents in microorganisms.

Authors:  B Sedgwick; P Vaughan
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Low-dose irradiation alters the transcript profiles of human lymphoblastoid cells including genes associated with cytogenetic radioadaptive response.

Authors:  Matthew A Coleman; Eric Yin; Leif E Peterson; David Nelson; Karen Sorensen; James D Tucker; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Radiation-induced adaptive response for protection against micronucleus formation and neoplastic transformation in C3H 10T1/2 mouse embryo cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; G P Raaphorst; R E Mitchel
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Cellular signal adaptation with damage control at low doses versus the predominance of DNA damage at high doses.

Authors:  L E Feinendegen; V P Bond; C A Sondhaus; K I Altman
Journal:  C R Acad Sci III       Date:  1999 Feb-Mar

Review 6.  Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signalling molecules in plants.

Authors:  Steven J Neill; Radhika Desikan; Andrew Clarke; Roger D Hurst; John T Hancock
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  In vitro, in vivo, and in silico analyses of the antitumor activity of 2-(4-amino-3-methylphenyl)-5-fluorobenzothiazoles.

Authors:  Chee Onn Leong; Marie Suggitt; David J Swaine; Michael C Bibby; Malcolm F G Stevens; Tracey D Bradshaw
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.261

8.  DNA damage response pathway in radioadaptive response.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Yosuke Ejima; Akira Tachibana; Toshiko Yamada; Kanji Ishizaki; Takashi Shimizu; Taisei Nomura
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Opposite responses in two DNA repair capacity tests in lymphocytes of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Maria Sasiadek; Kamila Schlade-Bartusiak; Monika Zych; Leszek Noga; Halina Czemarmazowicz
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double-strand breaks in DNA.

Authors:  S Wolff; V Afzal; J K Wiencke; G Olivieri; A Michaeli
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1988-01
View more
  24 in total

1.  Structural maintenance of chromosomes flexible hinge domain containing 1 (SMCHD1) promotes non-homologous end joining and inhibits homologous recombination repair upon DNA damage.

Authors:  Mengfan Tang; Yujing Li; Xiya Zhang; Tingting Deng; Zhifen Zhou; Wenbin Ma; Zhou Songyang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  A DNA2 Homolog Is Required for DNA Damage Repair, Cell Cycle Regulation, and Meristem Maintenance in Plants.

Authors:  Ning Jia; Xiaomin Liu; Hongbo Gao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Phenotype microarray analysis of the AdeRS two-component system in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  J-R Sun; Y-S Chiang; H-S Shang; C-L Perng; Y-S Yang; T-S Chiueh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Modulation of Gene Silencing by Cdc7p via H4 K16 Acetylation and Phosphorylation of Chromatin Assembly Factor CAF-1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tiffany J Young; Yi Cui; Joseph Irudayaraj; Ann L Kirchmaier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A diRNA-protein scaffold module mediates SMC5/6 recruitment in plant DNA repair.

Authors:  Jieming Jiang; Xiaolin Ou; Danlu Han; Zhipeng He; Song Liu; Ning Mao; Zhonghui Zhang; Chang-Lian Peng; Jianbin Lai; Chengwei Yang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 12.085

6.  Does single-dose cell resistance to the radio-mimetic zeocin correlate with a zeocin-induced adaptive response in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains?

Authors:  E Dimova; M Dimitrova; D Miteva; Z Mitrovska; N P Yurina; P E Bryant; S Chankova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  The RNA Exosome Channeling and Direct Access Conformations Have Distinct In Vivo Functions.

Authors:  Jaeil Han; Ambro van Hoof
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  DNA double-strand breaks promote endoreduplication in radish cotyledon.

Authors:  Misa Matsuda; Yuji Iwata; Nozomu Koizumi; Kei-Ichiro Mishiba
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.570

9.  DNA damage during G2 phase does not affect cell cycle progression of the green alga Scenedesmus quadricauda.

Authors:  Monika Hlavová; Mária Čížková; Milada Vítová; Kateřina Bišová; Vilém Zachleder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA damage triggers reprogramming of differentiated cells into stem cells in Physcomitrella.

Authors:  Nan Gu; Yosuke Tamada; Akihiro Imai; Gergo Palfalvi; Yukiko Kabeya; Shuji Shigenobu; Masaki Ishikawa; Karel J Angelis; Chunli Chen; Mitsuyasu Hasebe
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 15.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.