Literature DB >> 10192361

Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.

D J Brenner1, E J Hall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether current fractionation and brachytherapy protraction schemes for the treatment of prostatic cancer with radiation are optimal, or could be improved. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed two mature data sets on radiotherapeutic tumor control for prostate cancer, one using EBRT and the other permanent seed implants, to extract the sensitivity to changes in fractionation of prostatic tumors. The standard linear-quadratic model was used for the analysis.
RESULTS: Prostatic cancers appear significantly more sensitive to changes in fractionation than most other cancers. The estimated alpha/beta value is 1.5 Gy [0.8, 2.2]. This result is not too surprising as there is a documented relationship between cellular proliferative status and sensitivity to changes in fractionation, and prostatic tumors contain exceptionally low proportions of proliferating cells.
CONCLUSIONS: High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy would be a highly appropriate modality for treating prostate cancer. Appropriately designed HDR brachytherapy regimens would be expected to be as efficacious as low dose rate, but with added advantages of logistic convenience and more reliable dose distributions. Similarly, external beam treatments for prostate cancer can be designed using larger doses per fraction; appropriately designed hypofractionation schemes would be expected to maintain current levels of tumor control and late sequelae, but with reduced acute morbidity, together with the logistic and financial advantages of fewer numbers of fractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10192361     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00438-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  210 in total

Review 1.  The impact on oncology of the interaction of radiation therapy and radiobiology.

Authors:  Vicente Pedraza Muriel
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Lohr; M Fuss; U Tiefenbacher; M Siegsmund; S Mai; J M Kunnappallil; B Dobler; P Alken; F Wenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Exploring two two-edged swords.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  21 years of biologically effective dose.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  [Long-term outcomes of two different treatment concepts with HDR brachytherapy boost for intermediate-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  Nina Seibold; György Kovács
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Hypofractionation results in reduced tumor cell kill compared to conventional fractionation for tumors with regions of hypoxia.

Authors:  David J Carlson; Paul J Keall; Billy W Loo; Zhe J Chen; J Martin Brown
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Impact of prolonged fraction dose-delivery time modeling intensity-modulated radiation therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma cell killing.

Authors:  Xiao-Kang Zheng; Long-Hua Chen; Xiao Yan; Hong-Mei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Biologically effective dose and definitive radiation treatment for localized prostate cancer: treatment gaps do affect the risk of biochemical failure.

Authors:  P Sanpaolo; V Barbieri; D Genovesi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.