Literature DB >> 24589919

Biologically effective dose and definitive radiation treatment for localized prostate cancer: treatment gaps do affect the risk of biochemical failure.

P Sanpaolo1, V Barbieri, D Genovesi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: It is not clear if prolongation of definitive external radiation therapy for prostate cancer has an effect on biochemical failure. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the biologically effective dose (BED), and in particular the duration of radiotherapy, intended as overall treatment time, has an effect on biochemical failure rates and to develop a nomogram useful to predict the 6-year probability of biochemical failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 670 patients with T1-3 N0 prostate cancer were treated with external beam definitive radiotherapy, to a total dose of 72-79.2 Gy in 40-44 fractions. The computed BED values were treated with restricted cubic splines. Variables were checked for colinearity using Spearman's test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR) rates. The Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors of biochemical relapse in the final most performing model and to create a nomogram. Concordance probability estimate and calibration methods were used to validate the nomogram.
RESULTS: Neoadjuvant and concomitant androgen deprivation was administered to 475 patients (70%). The median follow-up was 80 months (range 20-129 months). Overall, the 6-year FFBR rate was 88.3%. BED values were associated with higher biochemical failure risk. Age, iPSA, risk category, and days of radiotherapy treatment were independent variables of biochemical failure.
CONCLUSION: A prolongation of RT (lower BED values) is associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure. The nomogram may be helpful in decision making for the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24589919     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0642-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  22 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Chemoradiotherapy duration correlates with overall survival in limited disease SCLC patients with poor initial performance status who successfully completed multimodality treatment.

Authors:  F Manapov; S Klöcking; M Niyazi; C Belka; G Hildebrandt; R Fietkau; G Klautke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  D J Brenner; E J Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Radiation therapy for early glottic carcinoma (T1N0M0). The adverse effect of treatment interruption.

Authors:  M Chatani; Y Matayoshi; N Masaki; T Teshima; T Inoue
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  The role of overall treatment time in the outcome of radiotherapy of prostate cancer: an analysis of biochemical failure in 4839 men treated between 1987 and 1995.

Authors:  Howard D Thames; Deborah Kuban; Larry B Levy; Eric M Horwitz; Patrick Kupelian; Alvaro Martinez; Jeffrey Michalski; Thomas Pisansky; Howard Sandler; William Shipley; Michael Zelefsky; Anthony Zietman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Adverse effect of treatment gaps in the outcome of radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  W Duncan; R H MacDougall; G R Kerr; D Downing
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Dose-fractionation sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5,969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) Gy.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Stephen A Roberts; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Jolyon H Hendry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The effect of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 75-06 and 77-06 experience.

Authors:  P P Lai; M V Pilepich; J M Krall; S O Asbell; G E Hanks; C A Perez; P Rubin; W T Sause; J D Cox
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Clinical results of combined treatment conformal high-dose-rate iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy using staging lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Junichi Hiratsuka; Yoshimasa Jo; Kenji Yoshida; Naomi Nagase; Masato Fujisawa; Yoshinari Imajo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; S A Leibel; P B Gaudin; G J Kutcher; N E Fleshner; E S Venkatramen; V E Reuter; W R Fair; C C Ling; Z Fuks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  5 in total

1.  A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer : are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT?

Authors:  Carmelo Marino; Elena Villaggi; Giulia Maggi; Marco Esposito; Lidia Strigari; Elisa Bonanno; Giusi R Borzì; Claudia Carbonini; Rita Consorti; David Fedele; Christian Fiandra; Isidora Ielo; Tiziana Malatesta; Maria Rosa Malisan; Anna Martinotti; Renzo Moretti; Barbara Nardiello; Caterina Oliviero; Stefania Clemente; Pietro Mancosu
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Application of a hydrogel spacer for postoperative salvage radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa; Carolin Schubert; Nuria Escobar-Corral; Richard Holy; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Adjuvant radiotherapy after salvage lymph node dissection because of nodal relapse of prostate cancer versus salvage lymph node dissection only.

Authors:  Hans Christian Rischke; Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann; Gesche Wieser; Malte Krönig; Vanessa Drendel; Petra Stegmaier; Tobias Krauss; Karl Henne; Natalia Volegova-Neher; Daniel Schlager; Simon Kirste; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Cordula Annette Jilg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Development of ProCaRS Clinical Nomograms for Biochemical Failure-free Survival Following Either Low-Dose Rate Brachytherapy or Conventionally Fractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Warner; Tom Pickles; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Luis Souhami; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; George Rodrigues
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 5.  An appraisal of analytical tools used in predicting clinical outcomes following radiation therapy treatment of men with prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elspeth Raymond; Michael E O'Callaghan; Jared Campbell; Andrew D Vincent; Kerri Beckmann; David Roder; Sue Evans; John McNeil; Jeremy Millar; John Zalcberg; Martin Borg; Kim Moretti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.