Literature DB >> 12961097

Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Alan Pollack1, Alex Hanlon, Eric M Horwitz, Steven Feigenberg, Robert G Uzzo, Robert A Price.   

Abstract

The response of prostate cancer to radiation was well-documented in the pre-PSA era. Large palpable tumors resolved within months of treatment with relatively modest radiation doses of 64-70 Gy. The use of PSA-based failure as an endpoint, however, has made it clear that cure rates were much lower than appreciated. While doses in this range are still widely used today, data from retrospective, sequential prospective and now randomized studies indicate that for patients with intermediate-to-high risk disease, doses above 70 Gy are associated with a significant reduction in biochemical failure. The use of 3D-conformal radiotherapy to escalate radiation dose has resulted in modest increases in rectal and bladder toxicity. The application of intensity modulated radiotherapy methods allows for greater sparing of the surrounding normal tissues and, hence, the potential to further escalate dose. The results of dose escalation, the ability of IMRT to reduce rectal and bladder exposure to high radiation doses and the use of new imaging methods to more accurately target the prostate are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12961097     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-003-0356-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  70 in total

1.  Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization.

Authors:  Anurag Chandra; Lei Dong; Eugene Huang; Deborah A Kuban; Laura O'Neill; Isaac Rosen; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Definitive radiation therapy in carcinoma of the prostate localized to the pelvis: experience at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology.

Authors:  C A Perez; M V Pilepich; D Garcia; J R Simpson; F Zivnuska; M A Hederman
Journal:  NCI Monogr       Date:  1988

3.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Lattanzi; S McNeeley; W Pinover; E Horwitz; I Das; T E Schultheiss; G E Hanks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Survival advantage for prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  G E Hanks; A L Hanlon; W H Pinover; E M Horwitz; T E Schultheiss
Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am       Date:  1999 May-Jun

5.  High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; Z Fuks; M Hunt; H J Lee; D Lombardi; C C Ling; V E Reuter; E S Venkatraman; S A Leibel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eugene Huang; Lei Dong; Anurag Chandra; Deborah A Kuban; Isaac I Rosen; Anissa Evans; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Dose/volume relationship of late rectal bleeding after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: absolute or relative rectal volume?

Authors:  Patrick A Kupelian; Chandana A Reddy; Thomas P Carlson; Twyla R Willoughby
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 8.  Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on survival in men treated with radiation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Deborah A Kuban; Gunar K Zagars
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy.

Authors:  J A Antolak; I I Rosen; C H Childress; G K Zagars; A Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; S A Leibel; P B Gaudin; G J Kutcher; N E Fleshner; E S Venkatramen; V E Reuter; W R Fair; C C Ling; Z Fuks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  18 in total

1.  Dosimetry and preliminary acute toxicity in the first 100 men treated for prostate cancer on a randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven J Feigenberg; Andre A Konski; Benjamin Movsas; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; C-M Charlie Ma; Shawn W McNeeley; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert A Price
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Preliminary experience of a predictive model to define rectal volume and rectal dose during the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M D Falco; M D'Andrea; D Fedele; R Barbarino; M Benassi; E Giudice; E Hamoud; G Ingrosso; P Ladogana; F Santarelli; G Tortorelli; R Santoni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Treatment planning and dosimetry of a multi-axis dynamic arc technique for prostate cancer: A comparison with IMRT.

Authors:  Kenshiro Shiraishi; Keiichi Nakagawa; Hideomi Yamashita; Naoki Nakamura; Masao Tago; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-01

4.  PSA Doubling Time Predicts for the Development of Distant Metastases for Patients Who Fail 3DCRT Or IMRT Using the Phoenix Definition.

Authors:  Tracy L Klayton; Karen Ruth; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert G Uzzo; Yu-Ning Wong; David Y T Chen; Mark Sobczak; Ruth Peter; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011

5.  Error Detectability of Isodose Volumes as ROIs in Prostate Intensity-modulated RT QA.

Authors:  Ryuta Nakahara; Masayuki Fujiwara; Haruyuki Takaki; Masao Tanooka; Kentaro Ishii; Ryu Kawamorita; Koichiro Yamakado
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Reduced rectal toxicity with ultrasound-based image guided radiotherapy using BAT (B-mode acquisition and targeting system) for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Markus Bohrer; Peter Schröder; Grit Welzel; Hansjörg Wertz; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Sabine Kathrin Mai
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Comparison of daily couch shifts using MVCT (TomoTherapy) and B-mode ultrasound (BAT System) during prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Steven H Lin; Elizabeth Sugar; Terrance Teslow; Todd McNutt; Habeeb Saleh; Danny Y Song
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08

Review 8.  Current role and future perspectives of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in radiation oncology for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zapotoczna; Giuseppe Sasso; John Simpson; Mack Roach
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  A validation of carbon fiber imaging couch top modeling in two radiation therapy treatment planning systems: Philips Pinnacle3 and BrainLAB iPlan RT Dose.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Jason Parker; Joseph Spurgin; Elizabeth Rhoe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Feasibility and radiation induced toxicity regarding the first application of transperineal implementation of biocompatible balloon for high dose radiotherapy in patients with prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Vassilis Kouloulias; Theodoros Kalogeropoulos; Kalliopi Platoni; John Georgakopoulos; George Matsopoulos; Dimitris Chaldeopoulos; Ivelina Beli; Panagiotis Pantelakos; Charalambos Asimakopoulos; John Kouvaris; Nikolaos Kelekis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.