Literature DB >> 10188722

Genetic pattern of prostate cancer progression.

T Saric1, Z Brkanac, D A Troyer, S S Padalecki, M Sarosdy, K Williams, L Abadesco, R J Leach, P O'Connell.   

Abstract

Genetic alterations in primary prostate cancer (CaP) have been extensively studied, yet little is known about the genetic mechanisms underlying progression of primary CaP to metastatic prostate cancer. As a result, it is not possible to distinguish clinically indolent localized disease from potentially life-threatening tumors with high metastatic potential. To address this question, we collected tissue from 34 autopsy-derived metastases, samples rarely analyzed in previous studies. These were compared to a separate set of 17 prostatectomy specimens containing 22 foci of CaP associated with 49 examples of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), a histological precursor of CaP. We compared the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) profiles of high-grade PIN, primary CaP and metastases by analyzing 33 microsatellite markers previously found to have high frequencies of LOH in primary CaP. These markers were on chromosomes 5q, 6q, 7q, 8p, 9p, 10q, 11p, 13q, 16q, 17, 18q and 21q. In addition, markers on chromosomes 4p, 11q, 14q and 20q with no reported LOH in primary CaP were analyzed to determine the frequency of background LOH. In PIN lesions, the rate of LOH was significant only at D5S806 (20%) and D16S422 (29%). In addition, different PIN lesions within the same prostate gland were genetically diverse, indicating divergent evolution of synchronous neoplastic precursor lesions. LOH frequency was progressively higher in primary CaP and metastatic lesions. In primary CaP, significant losses occurred at the 8p, 10q, 11p, 16q, 17p, 18q and 21q loci (range 17-43%). Distinct patterns of LOH frequencies were observed in primary CaP compared with metastases. Although some loci (D16S422, D17S960, D21S156) showed similar frequencies of LOH in primary CaP and metastatic CaP, most other loci showed up to 7-fold metastasis-related increases. The metastatic samples revealed previously unrecognized prostate cancer LOH at D5S806, D6S262, D9S157, D13S133 and D13S227. These significant stage-specific differences in LOH frequency specify genetic loci that may play key roles in CaP progression and could represent clinically useful biomarkers for CaP aggressiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10188722     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990412)81:2<219::aid-ijc9>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

1.  Genetic pathways and new progression markers for prostate cancer defined by microsatellite allelotyping.

Authors:  Rolf von Knobloch; Lutz Konrad; Peter J Barth; Heidrun Brandt; Sebastian Wille; Axel Heidenreich; Roland Moll; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Radiosensitization of prostate cancer by priming the wild-type p53-dependent cellular senescence pathway.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; James A McCubrey; David M Terrian
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  Mouse models of prostate cancer: picking the best model for the question.

Authors:  Magdalena M Grabowska; David J DeGraff; Xiuping Yu; Ren Jie Jin; Zhenbang Chen; Alexander D Borowsky; Robert J Matusik
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of prostatic adenocarcinomas from screening studies : early cancers may contain aggressive genetic features.

Authors:  J C Alers; P J Krijtenburg; A N Vis; R F Hoedemaeker; M F Wildhagen; W C Hop; T T van Der Kwast; F H Schröder; H J Tanke; H van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  A new branch on the tree: next-generation sequencing in the study of cancer evolution.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Brosnan; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 7.727

6.  Genomic profiling of cell-free DNA in blood and bone marrow of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Heidi Schwarzenbach; Felix K-H Chun; Hendrik Isbarn; Hartwig Huland; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  HIN-1, a putative cytokine highly expressed in normal but not cancerous mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  I E Krop; D Sgroi; D A Porter; K L Lunetta; R LeVangie; P Seth; C M Kaelin; E Rhei; M Bosenberg; S Schnitt; J R Marks; Z Pagon; D Belina; J Razumovic; K Polyak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Targeting prostate cancer based on signal transduction and cell cycle pathways.

Authors:  John T Lee; Brian D Lehmann; David M Terrian; William H Chappell; Franca Stivala; Massimo Libra; Alberto M Martelli; Linda S Steelman; James A McCubrey
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  NSAIDs modulate CDKN2A, TP53, and DNA content risk for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Patricia C Galipeau; Xiaohong Li; Patricia L Blount; Carlo C Maley; Carissa A Sanchez; Robert D Odze; Kamran Ayub; Peter S Rabinovitch; Thomas L Vaughan; Brian J Reid
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  FGF8 isoform b expression in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  V J Gnanapragasam; M C Robinson; C Marsh; C N Robson; F C Hamdy; H Y Leung
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.