Literature DB >> 8632690

Assessing the health of the nation. The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health.

M Gold1, P Franks, P Erickson.   

Abstract

Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures are becoming increasingly important for evaluating the effectiveness of medical interventions and assessing the health of populations. Preference-based instruments, a subset of HRQOL measures, allow comparisons of overall health status in populations and in clinical settings, and are suitable for economic analyses; but validity studies have used selected samples, mostly examining morbidity. This study compared the performance of a preference-based instrument with self-rated health in predicting subsequent self-rated health, hospitalization, and mortality in a national cohort. A version of the Health Utility Index (HUI), constructed from questions in the 1982 to 1984 National Health and Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS), was used to develop scores for the 1982 to 1984 survey sample. The relationship between both the NHEFS-HUI and self-rated health in 1982 to 1984, and subsequent decline in self-rated health, hospitalizations, and mortality experienced by 1987 were examined using survival analyses. The analyses adjusted for sociodemographic variables (age, sex, race, education, and income), medical conditions, and smoking status reported at the 1982 to 1984 NHEFS interview. Results indicated that NHEFS-HUI and self-rated health scores were worse in older persons, persons with one or more medical conditions, African Americans, and those with less education and lower incomes. The effects of all 19 chronic conditions and smoking were reflected in lower self-rated health scores, whereas the NHEFS-HUI did not capture the effects of two of the conditions or smoking status. Both measures made independent contributions to predicting hospitalizations and mortality by 1987; in addition, the NHEFS-HUI predicted decline in subsequent self-rated health. The NHEFS-HUI also predicted health outcomes in the subgroup of those in initial excellent or very good self-rated health. A preference-based instrument demonstrated predictive validity in three relevant domains of health status outcomes across all sociodemographic groups examined in this cohort. Self-rated health was better able to capture concurrent decrements in health associated with certain chronic illnesses and smoking. It is concluded that preference-based measures capturing both functional status and health perceptions should be incorporated explicitly into national surveys to assess the health of populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8632690     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199602000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  44 in total

1.  The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status.

Authors:  P C Austin; M Escobar; J A Kopec
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Effect of a transient, geographically localised economic recovery on community health and income studied with longitudinal household cohort interview method.

Authors:  L L Glenn; R W Beck; G L Burkett
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication.

Authors:  J L Bosch; M G Hunink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Linking the health utilities index to National Medical Expenditure Survey data.

Authors:  J A Rizzo; S Pashko; R Friedkin; J Mullahy; J L Sindelar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Housing and inequalities in health: a study of socioeconomic dimensions of housing and self reported health from a survey of Vancouver residents.

Authors:  J R Dunn
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  The effect of smoking on years of healthy life (YHL) lost among middle-aged and older Americans.

Authors:  Truls Østbye; Donald H Taylor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Worsening trends and increasing disparities in health-related quality of life: evidence from two French population-based cross-sectional surveys, 1995-2003.

Authors:  Etienne Audureau; Stéphane Rican; Joël Coste
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality among survivors of AKI.

Authors:  Vilija R Joyce; Mark W Smith; Kirsten L Johansen; Mark L Unruh; Andrew M Siroka; Theresa Z O'Connor; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Development of a preference-based index from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25.

Authors:  Anne M Rentz; Jonathan W Kowalski; John G Walt; Ron D Hays; John E Brazier; Ren Yu; Paul Lee; Neil Bressler; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.