Literature DB >> 3686119

The Nottingham health profile: a useful tool for epidemiologists?

P Kind1, R Carr-Hill.   

Abstract

The Nottingham health profile has been portrayed as a multipurpose measure of health status, capable of being used in population surveys and in evaluation of medical interventions. This paper examines basic operating characteristics of the profile, using data collected in a large survey of the community. Examination of the response pattern suggests that the NHP is not effective in discriminating health statuses as the modal response is zero. If it is to be used as a screening tool then there are considerable redundancies so that two or three items are sufficient; and for a diagnostic purpose, the existence of substantial covariation between items makes interpretation difficult. There is a need for an instrument fulfilling one or all of these purposes, but we need to know the operating characteristics of any instrument in detail before applying it. These results demonstrate that the methodological base of the NHP has yet to be established.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3686119     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90260-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  26 in total

1.  Perceived health in a population based sample of victims of the 1956 polio epidemic in the Netherlands.

Authors:  F Nollet; B Ivanyi; A Beelen; R J De Haan; G J Lankhorst; M De Visser
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Social indicators of health needs for general practice: a simpler approach.

Authors:  J L Hopton; J G Howie; A M Porter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research.

Authors:  R T Anderson; N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; W L McBee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Practical experiences in auditing patient outcomes.

Authors:  M J Bardsley; J M Coles
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

5.  Health of a team competing in the 1990 World Solar Car Challenge.

Authors:  R G Moorhead; C Laurence
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Is traditional rural lifestyle a barrier for quality of life assessment? A case study using the Short Form 36 in a rural Chinese population.

Authors:  Chaojie Liu; Ningxiu Li; Xiaohui Ren; Danping Liu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Electronic pelvic floor symptoms assessment: tests of data quality of ePAQ-PF.

Authors:  G L Jones; S C Radley; J Lumb; S Jha
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-14

8.  The MOS SF-36 health survey questionnaire in severe chronic airflow limitation: comparison with the Nottingham Health Profile.

Authors:  A J Crockett; J M Cranston; J R Moss; J H Alpers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: the Nottingham Health Profile and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  K I VanderZee; R Sanderman; J Heyink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Evidence for the sensitivity of the SF-36 health status measure to inequalities in health: results from the Oxford healthy lifestyles survey.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; R Layte; A Coulter; L Wright
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.