Literature DB >> 1583936

Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement.

M E Kantz1, W J Harris, K Levitsky, J E Ware, A R Davies.   

Abstract

Many assume that, relative to generic measures, condition-specific health measures are both more sensitive to the condition's severity and more specific because they are less affected by other conditions. We analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of the generic SF-36, condition-specific scales based on the SF-36, and condition-specific measures based on the Knee Society's Clinical Rating System in a study of osteoarthritis patients following knee replacement. As hypothesized, knee-specific role function and pain measures were more specific than generic measures among patients with other comorbid conditions, and less so among patients with only knee problems. Physical function scales of both types were equally specific. Clinical indicators based on x-ray and range of motion were only weakly related to all measures of function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583936     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  49 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Prospective versus retrospective measurement of change in health status: a community based study in Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors:  T V Perneger; J F Etter; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Inpatient rehabilitation for hip or knee osteoarthritis: 2 year follow up study.

Authors:  M Weigl; F Angst; G Stucki; S Lehmann; A Aeschlimann
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Multivariate analysis of health status scores: chronic airway disorders and the MOS SF-36.

Authors:  E R Cox; C M Kozma; C E Reeder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research.

Authors:  R T Anderson; N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; W L McBee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority.

Authors:  C D Naylor; J I Williams
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-03

Review 7.  Patient defined outcomes.

Authors:  A R Davies
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

8.  Health-related quality of life in veterans with prevalent total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Singh; J A Sloan
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; C Acquadro; J Alonso; G Apolone; D Bucquet; M Bullinger; K Bungay; S Fukuhara; B Gandek; S Keller
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Health-related quality of life after tricompartment knee arthroplasty with and without an extended-duration continuous femoral nerve block: a prospective, 1-year follow-up of a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; R Scott Meyer; Linda T Le; Edward R Mariano; Brian A Williams; Krista Vandenborne; Pamela W Duncan; Daniel I Sessler; F Kayser Enneking; Jonathan J Shuster; Rosalita C Maldonado; Peter F Gearen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.