Literature DB >> 1986857

Quality-of-life-adjusted survival for comparing cancer treatments. A commentary on TWiST and Q-TWiST.

M L Feldstein1.   

Abstract

In chronic disease situations where treatment comparisons favor no particular therapy, or where definitive outcome requires a considerable follow-up period, it is useful to have additional and perhaps intermediate endpoints of relevant clinical significance to compare treatments. One such endpoint is Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity (TWiST) which, together with Q-TWiST, attempts to address the quality of life of patients receiving the competing regimens. This paper provides a commentary on these techniques with an emphasis on the problems inherent in implementing Q-TWiST, a measure that attempts to incorporate patient value preferences into TWiST. It is argued that while Q-TWiST is intuitively appealing in the clinical setting, there are formidable design and psychometric hurdles that must be overcome to fully operationalize the concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1986857     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+<851::aid-cncr2820671417>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the effect of cancer on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Approaches to the analysis of quality of life data: experiences gained from a medical research council lung cancer working party palliative chemotherapy trial.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Defining treatment aims and end-points in older patients with cancer.

Authors:  C E Desch; T J Smith
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Oncology Modeling for Fun and Profit! Key Steps for Busy Analysts in Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Jaclyn Beca; Don Husereau; Kelvin K W Chan; Neil Hawkins; Jeffrey S Hoch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Patients' and doctors' perception of long-term morbidity in patients with testicular cancer clinical stage I. A descriptive pilot study.

Authors:  S D Fosså; C Moynihan; S Serbouti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Scale for assessing quality of life of children survivors of cranial posterior fossa tumors.

Authors:  J Martinez-Climent; V Castel Sanchez; C Esquembre Menor; A Verdeguer Miralles; J Ferris Tortajada
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Cost-effectiveness of pregabalin versus venlafaxine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: findings from a Spanish perspective.

Authors:  Montserrat Vera-Llonch; Ellen Dukes; Javier Rejas; Oleg Sofrygin; Marko Mychaskiw; Gerry Oster
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-06-09

8.  A cost-utility analysis of pregabalin versus venlafaxine XR in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in Portugal.

Authors:  Luís Silva Miguel; Nuno Silva Miguel; Mónica Inês
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2013-04-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.