Literature DB >> 10155314

The cost effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden.

M Johannesson1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to carry out an analysis of the cost effectiveness of antihypertensive drug treatment in different patient groups in Sweden. The cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated as net costs (treatment costs minus reduced costs of cardiovascular morbidity) divided by the number of life-years gained (the increase in life expectancy). The analysis was based on the reduction of coronary heart disease and stroke in the most recent meta-analysis of antihypertensive treatment, to which Swedish cost data were applied. We found that the cost per life-year gained decreases with age for both men and women, and is relatively low for middle-aged and older patients, even when the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) range is 90 to 94mm Hg. In conclusion, the results indicate that, in Sweden, antihypertensive treatment is generally cost effective in middle-aged and older patients with a DBP of > or = 90 mm Hg. However, it is questionable whether it is generally cost effective to treat younger patients with mild hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155314     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199507030-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  24 in total

1.  Principles of cost-effective resource allocation in health care organizations.

Authors:  M C Weinstein
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension treatment--a review of methodological issues.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  A computer simulation model for cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiovascular disease prevention.

Authors:  M Johannesson; J Hedbrant; B Jönsson
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec

4.  A review of cost-effectiveness analyses of hypertension treatment.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Public-health rounds at the Harvard School of Public Health. Allocation of resources to manage hypertension.

Authors:  W B Stason; M C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J T Edelson; M C Weinstein; A N Tosteson; L Williams; T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  An economic evaluation of lovastatin for cholesterol lowering and coronary artery disease reduction.

Authors:  J W Hay; E H Wittels; A M Gotto
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The costs of treating hypertension in Sweden. An empirical investigation in primary health care.

Authors:  M Johannesson; L Borgquist; B Jönsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Cardiovascular risk factors in treated hypertensives--a nation-wide, cross-sectional study in Sweden.

Authors:  P Nilsson; D K Andersson; P E Andersson; A Schwan; B Ostlind; R Malmborg; H Lithell; O K Andersson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition for primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  L Goldman; M C Weinstein; P A Goldman; L W Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Cost per millimeter of mercury lowering is a measure of economic value for antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  R S Chen; P Lapuerta
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics of hypertension management: the place of combination therapy.

Authors:  E Ambrosioni
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations? A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men.

Authors:  I U Haq; L E Ramsay; W W Yeo; P R Jackson; E J Wallis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Cost effectiveness of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis in Sweden: an economic evaluation based on the MORE study.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; David Sykes; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Frequency of cardiovascular events in patients treated with anti hypertensive agents: A cohort study based on claims data generated by primary care practice.

Authors:  Pierluigi Russo; Alessandro Capone; Alessandra Sturani; Ezio Degli Esposti
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2004-09

Review 6.  Hypertension, hypertrophy, heart failure.

Authors:  M G Nicholls
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  H Pardell; R Tresserras; P Armario; R Hernández del Rey
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Cost-effectiveness of raloxifene in the UK: an economic evaluation based on the MORE study.

Authors:  J A Kanis; F Borgström; O Johnell; A Oden; D Sykes; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A predictive model of the health benefits and cost effectiveness of celiprolol and atenolol in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  R J Milne; S Vander Hoorn; R T Jackson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Pharmacoeconomic burden of undertreating hypertension.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Giorgia Valpiani
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.